Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Latin declension templates/reply (13)

With Ancient Greek, the subcategorization makes sense because there are more than 150 templates. With Latin, there are only about 50, which fit neatly within a single category. I still don't see a reason to split that up when they conviently fit in a single category as it is. What would be gained by splitting up the category? Do keep in mind that quite a few of the listed templates do not follow any of the standard declensions, and at least two of the current templates are mixed declension. So, the category size is easily manageable and the contents do not subdivide easily or neatly. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)