Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Macedonian Passive Participles

I have been thinking about the passive participles in the verb conjugation templates and I am wondering if we shouldn't include them for all verbs. Although not all verbs can have a passive participle with an adjectival meaning (such as most intransitive verbs), all verbs use the passive participle form in the neuter to form the "има-конструкција", which basically produces alternative present perfect and pluperfect forms (along those with л-participles). Thus, whereas one can't take the verb "паѓа" (to fall) to derive "паѓан" with the meaning "fallen" and then use it to modify a noun to mean "that which has been fallen" (this doesn't make sense in English either) or "that which has been falling), one can indeed say "имам паѓано" to mean "I have fallen" (continuously, because "паѓа" is imperfective; I don't know how to convey the idea in English - using "I have been falling" implies a connection to the present that is not suggested in the Macedonian verb form) or "имав паѓано" to mean "I had fallen" (again, continuously). Thus, the adjectival participle is fully functional in this sense. So, should we include it for every verb due to this "има-конструкција" or not? If we do, would we start using the neuter form instead of the masculine, because the "има-конструкција" only uses the neuter, regardless of person or number? If we write the masculine for verbs which only use this participle in the "има-конструкција", I think that would be misleading.