Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Nocat=1 in plural of/reply

There was a discussion in December's Beer Parlour I think. The idea is that form-of templates should preferably not categorise. Most of them already don't, so it's confusing if some do and others don't.

My own view is that the part-of-speech category should not be added by a form-of template. But it should be ok for form-of templates to add other kinds of category. For example "obsolete spelling" is fine, because that's not a part of speech. Part of speech categories should be added by the headword template.