Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Perfective and imperfectie forms/reply (3)

In your first message, you say I'm duplicating the meanings, yet now you're saying they're different after all. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

If there is a difference, then you need to justify why there needs to be a second category. So far I don't see any justification, regardless of whether you think you've given one. All I see is you saying "they add categories because does too". But that's not a justification at all. Why do we need a category specifically for something as ill-defined as an "imperfective form"? If the two verbs form a pair, then it's arbitrary which one you choose to categorise, so there needs to be a reason for it. You can't just go ahead and create pointless categories.