Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Please undelete liv "forms" templates/reply (3)

The actual table that is used now is, and all three existing conjugation templates now use it. They don't look any different, but if you look at their source code, they're much smaller and simpler now. They just call with a number of parameters.

I created as an experiment. I wondered if things would look nicer if they were organised that way instead. I'm not sure if it's an improvement, because it makes the table very long and thin. In any case, if we want to use it, all we need to do is change, say, to use it instead of. You don't need to change the parameters, only the name of the table template at the beginning of the source code of. This is why this split is so useful: the presentation/interface (the table) is separated from the implementation (the templates that work out what the verb forms are). So you can change one without the other, and re-use the table with as many different templates as you need.

The issue with your form entries is that they use templates in a way that has been deprecated a long time ago. On User:Neitrāls vārds/liv-conj-jellõ forms, the template is called with   to specify the term to link back to. But linking to terms in that way has been deprecated for a long time, instead you should just write the term directly without the  around it. So instead of writing, you should write. The extra link brackets are redundant and shouldn't be used.