Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why did you remove the Sexagenary cycle category I created?/reply (10)

Yes, I was misreading the table I was looking at. Both stems and branches increment at the same rate, with the difference of 2 in the length of the lists ensuring the cycle of 60, and preventing an even-numbered stem from ever coinciding with an odd-numbered branch, or vice-versa. I have no clue why it took me three tries to get it right...