Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (4)

It kind of does, becauſe when the new ſyntax is agreed upon, we will have to rewrite all direct tranſcluſions of "mention" templates all over again. So we might as well do it in one go.

And wiþ some care, the whole change does not have to be ſuch a flag day eiþer. I added a ſeparate "incompat" mode ſpecifically to give it chance to be teſted in a ſmall ſcale before changing all templates.

And by þe way: I would like to ſee a nongloss parameter (or ſimilar) added to templates for annotating terms with non-gloſs definitions. Say,.