Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Would the affix template you suggested work for this word?

Recently I asked Chuck Entz for advice on how to set up the etymology for a word. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User_talk:Chuck_Entz#Etymology_format_for_suffix_gloss

You suggested the following: ''An alternative is to use, a recently created template. It detects the type of affix (base, prefix, suffix, interfix) based on the parameters given, so there is no ambiguity. —CodeCat 01:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)''

Today I posted a word that has two suffixes. My language (Wauja) uses suffixes quite exuberantly, and some words have three in a row, or more. Here is the word: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/yamukunauntope The etymology that you see there now is just a placeholder, to show you how I would like it to be displayed to the visitor. But it's just manually formatted, which is not what I want because it won't add the example to a list of entries for that suffix. Could the affix template you mentioned serve in a case like this?

Thanks!