Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Write Down Page/reply (17)

Ignore everything said previously, try another tact.

"Anon, any anonymous user who"

I am not an anon. My channel is very public.

"repeatedly reverts admin edits that undid that anon's edits is generally viewed negatively by the community."

By which community? The community of admins or the community the admins are supposed to be communicating with? If you mean the latter, I will restate:

Hi there, The video added to an external links section on the write down page is on topic. Please add it back. Thank you. Please explain how an on-topic external source is spam.

If that anon then engages in invective, the community opinion of that anon generally doesn't improve.

I did not slander my link as "spam", CodeCat did.

"I understand that you're frustrated and piqued."

No, you don't, or you would be addressing my complaint. As it is, you have decided to take the argument from authority route.

"However, engaging in hostilities with the very people who might be able to help you does nothing to advance your position."

Exactly, using reason is better than slandering a link as "spam". The correct course of action is to communicate with the community to tell the community why the link is not suitable.

"Either calm down,"

No. You start acting like this is a community.

start listening to what people are trying to tell you,

1. Spam 2. Overly detailed 3. No YouTube links

I responded to all of these ridiculous rejoinders and hence expect a response. Dicitonaries are not suppossed to be "overly detailed"?

and stop trying to refute everything you're told

A community is a collection of individuals who work together. An army is a collection of individuals unthinkingly directed by a chain of command. Is Wiki an army or a community?

or you will almost certainly be blocked as a vandal or troll.

Block away you mindless boob. Dictionaries should have detail, my link is on topic, and external links are a common practice on Wiki.,

I don't say this as a threat, and instead as a simple unemotional explanation of how things tend to work around here.

That is fine. As far as I am concerned, you go against the spirit of Wiki by exhibited such anti-community behaivor.