Thread:User talk:CodeCat/conjugation of venio/reply (6)

Seems good to me so far. Could you just add feminine and neuter forms in the formation of perfect, future perfect and pluperfect (indicative and subjunctive)? So that we have (for example) auditus, audita, auditum + present indicative of sum instead of auditus alone. Same goes for future active infinitive (auditurus, auditura, auditurum esse), perfect passive infinitive (auditus, audita, auditum esse), future active participle (auditurus, auditura, auditurum), perfect passive participle (auditus, audita, auditum) and future passive participle (audiendus, audienda, audiendum).

Besides, I wonder if we shouldn't add a gerund line, which seems to be included in the future passive participle, while they're different things (even if sometimes one replaces the other). Gerund exists only in the accusative audiendum, genitive audiendi, and ablative audiendo (sometimes in the dative too), and has an active meaning. Legendo (or magistrum audiendo) doctus eris means "By reading (listening to your teacher) you will be learned". ad venandum rex profectus est means "The king left to go hunting", and Cupidus discendi sum "I'm eager to learn".