Thread:User talk:CodeCat/template:sense

Why do you insist on making unilateral - and therefore ill-considered - changes to widely transcluded templates? That others can make unilateral changes without objection is not a good precedent for you. You seem to lack the good judgment and/or technical skill that has enabled other technical contributors to make changes that were more beneficial and less disruptive of existing practices. Yours do not reach that high standard. Your approach to "improvements" seems to be to try to force contributors to do things in a way that makes it easier for you to enforce your delusional, dirigiste vision of Wiktionary's future without bothering to take into account enough of the effects of the things you change.