Thread:User talk:Kephir/Template:lad-noun

Thanks for letting me, right now, I was going through the languages such as Serbo-Croatian, Azeri, Karakalpak and their templates to understand and also through parser functions...but it all looks very complicated. Anyway, I didn't know that these letters (such as l=Latin etc.) are predetermined, I thought we determined them each time, when writing the template.

About the Ladino language, (see what I wrote here), there are no standardised spelling, however there are spelling norms. I'll give an example:

The word for a "young woman" is muchacha. It's pronounced the same in almost all the dialects, but the spelling is:
 * muchacha (Multidialectal and Aki Yerushalayim spelling)
 * מוגֿאגֿה (Square Hebrew spelling)
 * mutchatcha (French spelling; tch = ch)
 * muçaça (Turkish spelling; ç = ch)

The word for soap:
 * xavón (Mult; x = sh)
 * שאבֿון (Hebr)
 * shavon (Aki)
 * chavon (Fren; ch = sh)
 * şavon (Turk; ş = sh)

These are the most common and citable spellings, however there also those who use other spelling conventions. About the dialectal variations mutchatche is an alternative form (e.g. dialect of Prishtine) of mutchatcha. And muçaçe is an alternative form of muçaça. However mutchatche and muçaçe are different spelling variants of each other and are pronounced the same. Do you think that these five forms (same pronunciation, different spelling rules or scripts) could be displayed under the word-class (e.g. Noun) in a raw? And the dialectal forms under the Alternative forms? What do you say? May be you could help me out.

Thanks, Friendly