Thread:User talk:Kephir/Template:lad-noun/reply

Those single-letter arguments to headword templates are not standardised, but script codes are (i.e. the usually four-letter codes which are passed to template parameters named sc or similar). They exist so that different fonts can be applied to different writing systems with CSS.

This is the sort of information we are supposed to be able to find at WT:About Ladino. If we had it. You know what to do now…

I think this should be handled through something between our approaches to English and Serbo-Croatian/Hindi-Urdu: within each writing system, pick one spelling for each individual word (based on, say, the popularity of each variation) to be the main lemma, which has full definitions. For the rest, write stub definitions using. But I have no strong opinions, and I am not quite convinced that this would be the best.

One thing we should take into consideration is how all these forms should be linked to one another. Would be good to know how Ladino inflects words. Right now we seem to have no inflection templates for Ladino (and the headwords only link to forms in alternative writing systems), but I do not know whether this is because Ladino words do not inflect, or just nobody got around to make these. (We seem to have a, though.)

And the "word-class (e.g. Noun)" is called a part of speech. Except when it is not.