Thread:User talk:Kephir/redirects

WT:redirects is a redlink and therefor makes me question your deletion based on a non-existent policy. The point of having such terms, which are apparently allowed based on the shut up and red herring examples linked in the other policy you cited as a deletion reason, WT:SOP, is to improve search features and make the word or, in this case, initialism easier to find. Since, WT:redirects is not a policy, and since WT:SOP suggests that these sum-of-parts terms are allowed (it links two of them), I'm requesting that you restore these two redirects. Thank you.