Thread:User talk:Rua/Origin of *strowéyeti?/reply (3)

Sorry, I meant. I found it in Kroonen's proto-Germanic dictionary [p. 483]. He explains and its PIE origin  as a "back-formation" of forms of the root *stṛh₃-. My point was that the Germanic term is indeed reconstructed as proper *str-, not as *sr- with emphatic -t-.

My concern, though, is more about the Slavic data. All forms of >, , , etc. are (probably) from , not from. Of course, as I pointed in a post-scriptum, ЭССЯ does not rule out a possible influence of on some meanings of. If you don't find a problem, I'll just add comment next to the Slavic data in. Also, I'm going to create the page of and will explain the two possible etymologies there. This should suffice to address any concerns like mine.