Thread:User talk:Rua/Possible solution for language-specific form-of templates/reply (6)

Huh, I would have used, with the more specific POS category in the cat2 parameter, and am surprised that "past active participles" is in Module:headword/data at all, because so many combinations of tense (in the traditional sense) and voice are possible. Ancient Greek verbs can have participles for any combination of present, aorist, perfect, or future and active, middle, passive, or mediopassive, but only a few of them are included in Module:headword/data. (But we don't categorize Ancient Greek participles by tense and voice at all right now.)

I'm not sure what the rationale is for every one of the items in  and   in Module:headword/data. (Seems like these should be language-specific because no language uses all of them. Restricting languages to specific items could keep entries more consistent, though I'm not sure if it's worth the additional complexity in our module infrastructure that would probably be required.)

I like the idea of automatically adding the basic PoS category. It would make more convenient. This has mainly come up for me with pronoun categories (personal pronouns, relative pronouns, etc.); I wish that was equivalent to.