Thread:User talk:Rua/Reverted changes/reply

You mistyped it, it's  and not. But I also reverted it for another reason, namely that people have in the past removed words just because they don't think they exist in their own language, when further examination shows that it actually does/did, just very rarely. I wanted to guard against that happening again.

The proper way to challenge the existence of terms is at WT:RFV. It's not usually used for entries that haven't been created yet, but it should be fine to use it to verify/challenge the existence of any term, whether there is already an entry or not. After all, a general rule is that if a term is shown to be invalid, it should have no links that point to that entry either, as such links can never be valid if the entry will never exist. So you can use that to challenge the validity of the link.