Thread:User talk:Rua/anivoq/reply (3)

You shouldn't be replacing with  indiscriminately. The whole reason we're doing it manually is so that each etymology can be examined individually. With what you're doing, you're not only giving other editors more work, but making it harder for them to find the entries that need that work. For that reason, it's better if entries have than if they incorrectly have. Your replacements are detrimental to Wiktionary, and should be undone.