User:Geographyinitiative/Wiktionary:Entry Assessment

Assements of Entrys/Senses A page for developing a scheme for assessing entries/senses

Likely Passes WT:ATTEST ("Validity Verified")
These entries/senses likely pass WT:ATTEST.

Authoritative Quality

 * Has Authoritative References; Has Ten Independent Cites with confirmed OCLC
 * Beijing, Chungking, Taipei

Good Quality

 * Has Five Independent Cites with confirmed OCLC
 * Chungnanhai

Basic Valid

 * Likely meets bare minimum of OCLC cites to prevent failure at RFV
 * Tsao-yang, Tsao-chuang, Zawa, Zengdu, Chapei, Chang-chia-k'ou, Kalgan, Zhangwan, Jhangjhou, Zhangzi, Ch'ang-tzu, Zhanhe

Poor Coverage ("Validity Unverified")
At this time, these entries/senses would be assumed to pass WT:ATTEST by "clearly widespread use". If they fail to appear in Google N-grams, should be considered for RFV.

Weak Pass

 * May have enough material to pass two week discussion
 * Tsaochuang

Approx 2 Valid Cites

 * Close to Valid
 * Tsaoyang, Zezhou, Zhangzhou

Approx 1 Valid Cites

 * Nascent
 * Zangguy, Zaozhuang, Zhabei, Zhang, Zhangjiaji, Zhangjiajie, Zhangjiakou, Changkiakow, Zhangpu, Zhangqiao, Zhangye

Approx 0 Valid Cites

 * Skeletal
 * Zaoyang, Chang