User:Ivan Štambuk/Discuss

These BCS entries need some discussion:


 * - literary Serbian is with final 'l' omitted, therefore it should be ? - the same for  which should be just
 * - is it used as a general-purpose word for hell in Serbian, or just as an Islamic concept ?
 * - the usual Serbian word is ?
 * amidžinca - can this word be verified, esp. in Serbian? very few google hits, esp. for Serbian Cyrillic variant
 * - should it be marked as, or used only in literature?
 * - is it an allowed variant of in literary Serbian?
 * boli - the usual BS plural is bolovi ?
 * - it should be in literary Serbian?
 * - mostly Croatian word, very rare in Serbian
 * - rare? can it be verified?
 * - rare? can it be verified?
 * - rare? can it be verified?
 * - rare? can it be verifed?
 * - rare? cant it be verified?
 * - mostly Croatian word, very rare in Serbian
 * - SoP, should be deleted
 * - mostly Croatian google hits, what is the usual Serbian word?
 * - pure Croatism, the usual Serbian word is
 * - pure Croatism
 * - I'd like to see this verified
 * - fantasy word, needs verification
 * - i think that this should be lemmatized at
 * - mostly Croatian, I'd like to see this verified
 * - much rarer than in Croatian, should it be marked as ?
 * - needs verification
 * - needs verification, very few google hits
 * - Persian source is highly unlikely; probably a deverbative of (probably influenced by  ->
 * - mostly Croatian, appears to be very rare on .yu, giving hits of Croatian citations
 * - 0 hits for Bosniak/Serbian, all b.g.c hits give Croatian literature, needs verification
 * - needs verification and usage label
 * - -džija suffix has been morphologized, listing Turkish source is misleading
 * - Croatism, appears to be very rare in Serbian
 * - not really used nowadays in modern Serbian
 * - fantasy word
 * - usual Serbian word is which has 2 orders of magnitude more hits ?
 * - rare in Serbian? formal-only?
 * - very rare on .yu. Croatism?
 * - can this be verified?
 * - how often is this used?
 * - is literary Serbian form ?
 * - is form with final -r allowed in literary Serbian?
 * - Croatism, the usual word is
 * - how did this Kaykavian-Slovene (they use -ek instead of -ak) lexeme ended up in Serbian ^_^ probably should be
 * can this be verified? Smells like heavy Croatism to me
 * needs verification
 * - needs verification and usage marker
 * - can this be verified?
 * - can this be verified
 * - Croatian Germanism, not really Serbian, no hits on .yu domain
 * - this Croatism needs usage marker, as I think that the usual word is
 * 0 hits on .yu, needs verification
 * - this regionalism needs verification
 * - 0 hits on .yu, needs verification
 * 0 google hits, probably invented word since it's been a long time since Serbian was written in morphophonological orthography ^_^
 * - illegal, I think that only imperfective form is allowed
 * - derived formed of, should be "unlemmatized"
 * - derived form, lemma is
 * - derived form, proper lemma
 * - derived form, proper lemma
 * obaveza - how can colloquial Croatian misspelling of be colloquial Bosniak/Seribian misspelling (which is in fact a standard spelling in Serbian AFAIN)
 * - mostly Croatian word, usual Serbian is
 * - this Germanism is mostly used in northern Croatia. Can Serbian/Bosniak sense be verified?
 * - this Croatism is rarely used in Serbian, it should be emphasized that the usual word is
 * - HER say from German < Latin  < Ancient Greek  < Akkadian  < Sumerian.
 * sapun - HER say it was directly from Latin sapo:, not mediated via Turkish
 * Category:bs:Languages and Category:hr:Languages - these -skis are really adjectives not nouns. They have implicit jezik inside, but formatting those like hrvatski jezik would be making SoP entries. So either English language nouns formatted as ===Noun=== (which are in fact adjectives with implicit language - I speak French = I speak in a French way, like a French) have Slavic adjectives in -ski as translations, or SoP entries should be made, or no translations would be given for them because of PoS mismatch.

Should Ijekavian Serbian be treated just as a variant of Ekavian, i.e. to create something like to reduce duplication and facilitate maintenance?