User:Roggy/About Latin

Translate into Russian / Перевожу на Русский


 * Смотри также Category:Latin language

(основано на Entry layout explained)

Замечание 1: Этот путеводитель предназначен, чтобы обеспечить руководящие принципы как для того, чтобы они создали латинские записи на английском Wiktionary так же как для того, чтобы добавить латинские переводы на английские слова. Главные руководящие принципы для того, чтобы создать любой вход на английском Wiktionary сформулированы в Entry layout explained; эта страница - дополнение к той странице, не замена.

Замечание 2: Если изменение происходит в основном wiktionary шаблоне (в настоящее время в Entry layout explained, объяснил, что записи латыни аффектов, то то изменение должно быть отражено здесь.

Не используйте лигатуры
Не используйте лигатуры. Не называйте записи для латинских слов с лигатурами, такими как æ или œ, поскольку они не появляются в Классической Латыни.

Предпочитайте написание с I; не используйте J
По латыни, буква, написанная как I в античные времена была как гласной, так и согласной, завися от позиции и слова, гласная была более распространена. У этих двух форм были различное произношение и различная метрическая обработка в поэзии.

Современное типографское соглашение (возникшее в средневековых почерках) состоит в том, чтобы написать J для согласной формы и оставить I для гласной. This is applied both to ordinary words and proper nouns. A similar modern convention exists in writing the vowel V as U (see below for more). But while U is very commonly written, the use of J is more variable.


 * Example: The word Iuppiter is sometimes written in modern texts as Juppiter -- using a J to represent the consonant form of the letter I. This is done to assist in pronunciation, and to conform to English expectations concerning the letters I and J.  However, the spelling Juppiter never occurred in Latin, so it should not appear as a separate entry in Wiktionary.

Many modern Latin-English dictionaries write J; for example, the substantial 1879 dictionary of Lewis and Short. Reprints of classical works on the other hand sometimes write J and sometimes write I, with the use of I being in a sense deliberately classical (though adherence to classical conventions rarely extends say to all-capitals and no spaces between words, as actually found in originals).

However, the major modern Latin textbooks use I more commonly for both consonant and vowel; for example the Cambridge and Oxford textbooks as well as Wheelock's. A significant number of standard dictionaries follow this convention too, such as the Shorter Edition of Lewis and Short. Since spellings in I are the norms being taught to new students and is the Classical norm as well, the letter J should not appear in Latin entries.

Предпочитайте V для согласной формы, но предпочитайте U для гласной формы
In Latin, the letter written as V in ancient times represented either a vowel or a consonant depending on its position and the word. These two forms had distinct pronunciations and different metrical treatment in poetry.

A modern typographical convention is to write U for the vowel and leave V as the consonant. Generally speaking English textbooks and dictionaries always write U this way and the majority of reprints of classical texts adapt them and show U too. The use of V for the vowel in new works is usually a consciously classical style or appearance, and that includes for example in inscriptions on new monuments and the like.

Since the vast majority of modern dictionaries, textbooks, and texts distinguish between U and V in printed forms, Wiktionary will adhere to the same distinction.


 * Example: The word eqvvs is usually presented in modern texts as equus -- using a U to represent the vowel form of the Latin letter V. This is done to assist in pronunciation, and to conform to English expectations concerning the letters U and V.  Even though the spelling equus never occurred in Classical Latin, it is the preferred form for Wiktionary both because it is the form used in textbooks and Latin dictionaries and because it is the form typically used in Later Latin texts.

Не используйте диакретические знаки в именах страницы
Most Latin dictionaries and textbooks use macrons (such as ā, ē, ī, ō, ū) in the headwords for entries. While these forms are traditional for reference works and useful to students, macrons do not appear in written Latin or in reproductions of literature and texts. Some older dictionaries and textbooks make use of breves (such as ă or ĭ), but these marks are not used in most textbooks nor in reproductions of literature. They appear in only a few modern dictionaries. Additionally, typing macrons or breves is difficult in many browsers and systems. Their use would make it difficult for users to search for words. For these reasons, the page name for Latin entries should not contain diacritical marks. However, macrons should be used within the body of pages. (see below)

Знаки долготы гласного звука, должен использоваться только в пределах страниц
It is conventional for printed Latin dictionaries to mark vowels that are pronounced long by placing a macron (a short horizontal bar, as in ā or ū) over such vowels in the headword. Such marks never appeared in written Latin, but are useful guides to pronunciation and are standard forms in textbooks. On Wiktionary, macrons should never be used in the names of entries, so the word līber would appear on the page liber. However, within the text of the page, macrons should be used wherever appropriate. For example:

Adjective
līber, lībera , līberum

In this example, the forms that would normally appear in the headers of a printed dictionary appear in the line immediately following the part of speech header. Notice that the linked forms are linked to pages named without macrons, while forms that will be displayed on the page are presented with macrons. Also notice that the (masculine) form matching the entry page is not linked, and so only needs to have the macron.
 * 1) free

Macrons should also be used on a page when linking to a Latin word entry from an Etymology, from a set of Translations, from Related terms, and from similar sections.

Значки краткости над гласными, не должны использоваться вообще
Some older dictionaries and textbooks make use of breves (such as ă or ĭ), but these marks are not used in most textbooks nor in reproductions of literature. They appear in only a few modern dictionaries. The purpose of including breves was to note the vowels whose pronunciation is short. However, if the long vowels are marked, it is unnecessary to mark the short ones since any unmarked vowel will be short. On Wiktionary, breves should not be used either in the names of pages for Latin words, nor in any of the text associated with Latin entries.

Note that some languages derived from Latin (such as Romanian) do make use of macrons, and for those derivative languages macrons should be used as appropriate.

The lemma and basic format
 Lemma:  albus        Non-lemma: albis Wiktionary will contain all words in the Latin language. Since Latin is a highly inflected language, this will eventually include all the inflected forms. The term lemma is used to refer to that basic or main form of the word—that which is usually listed as a headword in bi-lingual dictionaries. The entry for the lemma form (eg albus) will give the main English meaning of the word and other grammatical information. Other forms, the non-lemma entries (eg albīs), will refer back to the lemma form.

It is possible for a single page to include the lemma for one word and non-lemma for another word. In the entry for, the verb section is the lemma for that verb, but the adjective section is not the lemma for that adjective (whose lemma is ).

The particular form that serves as the lemma is specific to each part of speech. For nouns, the lemma is usually the nominative singular; for adjectives, it is the masculine nominative singular; and for verbs, it is the first-person singular present active indicative (first principal part). For information about choosing the correct form as lemma for other parts of speech, see the various sections on parts of speech below.

Each entry must contain at least two headers ==Latin== and a POS, where "POS" is shorthand for "Part of speech header". The "Latin" header identifies the language and must be at level 2 (L2). The POS subheader is usually at L3, but may appear at a deeper level in some circumstances. The entry below shows this portion of the text for a noun, further details will follow below, but first the pre-POS headers will be considered: (used to produce a horizontal line when not the first language.) ==Latin== ===Noun===    (the POS header)

When a single page contains both Latin and non-Latin entries (such as the page for elate), the languages are listed in alphabetial order, but with English coming before other languages. Each language is separated from the preceding language by a horiziontal line produced by typing four dashes, as demonstrated above.

Preferred sequence of sections
Each Latin entry should eventually include several sections, although not every entry will have all possible sections. Each section has a standard, invariant header and the sections occur in a standard sequence for all languages (See WT:ELE and this vote).

The following is the preferred sequence for standard sections, but please note that the Noun header is only one possible part of speech that may appear as the header. If the entry being created is for a Latin verb, then "Verb" should appear in place of the word "Noun" in the example below.

==Latin== ===Alternative spellings=== ===Etymology=== ===Pronunciation=== ===Noun===      (the POS header) ====Usage notes==== ====Inflection==== ====Quotations==== ====Synonyms==== ====Antonyms==== ====Derived terms==== ====Related terms==== ====Descendants==== ====See also==== ===References===

This sequence is standard across all languages, though some entries may modify this structure when there is more than one word in a language with the same spelling. In these cases, there may be more than one Etymology section and/or more than one Pronunciation section. (See Multiple etymology or pronunciation sections.)

The various section headers are considered here in three groups: (1) pre-POS headers, (2) POS headers and Inflection headers, and (3) other post-POS headers.

Pre-POS headers
Details are given below for each of the three common pre-POS headers and the template. These items should appear in the following sequence with exceptions only as described below under Multiple etymology or pronunciation sections.

==Latin== ===Alternative spellings=== ===Etymology=== ===Pronunciation=== ===Noun===    (the POS header)

Also
 Examples: canō, augustus This is not a header, and is not placed under any header. It uses the template , providing a navigational aid in the form of links to words in any language with a very similar spelling.

The template is used only when additional pages exist with the same basic sequence of letters or characters, but with differences in capitalization, accents, other diacritical marks, hyphenation, etc. When it is used, the Also template should appear at the very top of the page, before all languages on that page. There, it will be easily seen by a user who has mistyped or is uncertain of the capitalisation, hyphenation, or accents in a word. For example, on the page forpan, the template displays as:


 * See also Pan, PAN, pan- ' Pan-'''

This template should never appear within a language section; it is placed at the head of the page. As a result, only one such tempate should be used per page. Additional documentation may be found at Template talk:also.

Alternative spellings
 Example: libēns This is the place for an alphabetical list of words of identical meaning and etymology but different spelling, such as and, or  and. Words of similar etymology but different meaning should appear under Related terms; unrelated but similarly spelt words should appear under See also if there is potential for confusion.

In cases where there is more than one part of speech in an entry, but the alternative spellings apply only to one part of speech, then the Alternative Spellings section may instead be placed under the appropriate POS as a subheader.

Etymology
 Example: dūriter
 * Further guidance is given in the main article Etymology.

When it is known that a Latin word is derived from another Latin word, that information should be included in the Etymology section. A simple example from the entry for is shown below. The syntax on the following line will give the output in grey that follows:

Etymology
From durus:

Latin words from Greek
 Example: cōmoedia Likewise, when it is known that a Latin word is derived from Ancient Greek, the Greek word from which the entry word is derived should be given, as in the following example for the word : From κωμῳδία:

The key points to note are (1) the Greek word is written with Greek letters (and is linked), (2) the template is used for words mentioned in the etymology, (3) a transliteration of the Greek is provided using tr=, (4) the code sc=polytonic is used to correctly display Ancient Greek script, and (5) the meaning in the original Greek is noted.

In addition, there is a special category for Latin derivations from Greek: Category:la:Ancient Greek derivations. This category is added automatically by use of the template when the ISO parameters are added. This template requires the parameters grc and la, as to indicate the language of origin first and then the language of the entry. Without the grc parameter, the template will be broken. Without the la parameter, the template will assume the word is English.

Pronunciation
currently under construction

Multiple etymology or pronunciation sections
Occasionally, a single Latin entry will include more than one word with the same spelling. When the words include more than one etymology or more than one pronunciation, the standard names or sequence of pre-POS headers will change. There are three situations in which this happens.


 * 1) Homographs: One possible situation is to have two words with separate etymologies, but that happen to be spelled the same way.  These are known as .  Homographs may have the same or different pronunciation.  An example is, which is not only a participle of  but also a masculine noun ("posture, gesture") in its own right.
 * 2) Heteronyms: Alternatively, a single Latin entry may include two words that are pronounced differently.  When such words have different etymologies, they are termed .  An example is  and.
 * 3) Macron forms: A third situation occurs when inflected forms of the same word have the same spelling but different pronunciations. In this situation, the placement of macrons differs between the two forms.  An example is  and, both forms of the adjective . This situation occurs regularly in first/second declension adjectives.

In each of the three cases listed above, the normal formatting is modified as described below.

The simple case
 Example: geminō The simple case includes only a single etymology and pronunciation for two or more different words. For these simple cases, the standard sequence of headers will suffice as shown in the example. The example below is taken from the entry for.

==Latin== ===Etymology=== ===Pronunciation=== ===Adjective===     (first POS header) ===Verb===          (second POS header)

Homographs
currently under construction

Macron forms
 Example: ūva, ūvā This situation occurs when there is a single etymology for two identically spelled inflections of the same word that differ in pronunciation. This situation occurs regularly in nouns of the first and fourth declensions as well as in first/second-declension adjectives and among certain verb forms. An example is and, which are different inflections of the same adjective. The ablative feminine form is pronounced differently from all other forms spelled the same way. For such cases, the standard sequence of headers is modified slightly as shown in the example. The example below is taken from the entry for.

==Latin== ===Etymology=== ===Pronunciation 1===     (first pronunciation header) ====Noun==== ===Pronunciation 2===     (second pronunciation header) ====Noun====

If the lemma form is part of the entry, it should be included in the first pronunciation section. If there is no lemma present in the entry, then the first pronunciation section should include the larger number of senses or definitions.

More complex cases
 Example: palma A more complicated situation is possible when there is more than one etymology for two identically spelled words, where one or both words have differently pronounced inflections spelled the same. This situation is rare, but an example is and, each of which are different inflections of two identically spelled nouns,  and  originating from separate root words. In this rare situation, a sequence of headers may be used as shown in the example below taken from the entry for.

==Latin== ===Etymology 1===       (first etymology header) ====Pronunciation 1====     (first pronunciation subheader) =====Noun===== ====Pronunciation 2====     (second pronunciation subheader) =====Noun===== ===Etymology 2===       (second etymology header) ====Pronunciation 1====     (third pronunciation subheader) =====Noun===== ====Pronunciation 2====     (fourth pronunciation subheader) =====Noun=====

Part of speech headers
currently under construction

Verbs
 Lemma:  amō        Non-lemma: amāre The lemma form for Latin verbs is the first principal part, that is, the first-person singular present active indicative. All other forms are non-lemmata.

Infinitives and other non-lemmata
Infinitives and other forms of Latin entries are non-lemma forms. The minimal entry for a Latin infinitive is:

Verb


The template adds the entry to Category:Latin verb forms. It requires the macron-bearing form of the entry as its only argument. If the entry has no macrons (e.g., the argument must still be included for clarity.

The template identifies the lemma form and particular inflected form of the entry. For details on the use of this template and its shortcuts, see Template talk:conjugation of.

Post-POS headers
Details are given below for each of the common post-POS headers. These items should appear in the following sequence.

===POS===    (the POS header) ====Usage notes==== ====Inflection==== ====Quotations==== ====Synonyms==== ====Antonyms==== ====Derived terms==== ====Related terms==== ====Descendants==== ====See also==== ===References===

Except for References, these headers will normally appear under a POS header and thus within a POS section. However, in certain cases, they will appear at the same level as the POS header. This will occur when there are two or more parts of speech with a shared etymology, and when the particular post-POS section applies to both of these. For example, a given spelling may have both an adjective and noun use, with a list of etymologically related terms that pertains to both. Rather than duplicating the Related terms section and listing it under both POS headers, the section is instead raised one level and placed after the second POS section.

Usage notes
This section may be used when usage of a term is more complex than can be expressed in the definitions. Usage notes include oddities of meaning, clarification of shades of meaning, and comparison to other Latin words with similar meanings. Such notes should be brief. Remember to describe how a term is used in Latin sources, rather than dictating how it should be used from someone's point of view.

Inflection
For Latin entries, this section should always use the Inflection header, and never the alternatives Declension or Conjugation. Doing so reduces the number of possible section names, and thus improves accessibility of Latin entries for learners of both Latin and English. It also sidesteps the problem created by participles, which are technically verbs but decline like adjectives.

For entries with irregular inflections, include a short sentence identifying specific irregularities.

Optionally, an an introductory message may be included to identify the particular inflection pattern for nouns or adjectives. A list of these may be found at Wiktionary:Latin inflection templates. However, for most regular inflection patterns, this is not necessary. The information is already incorporated into the verb conjugation tables, and may eventually be incorporated into the declension tables as well.

The primary component of the Inflection section is a declension or conjugation table. Most regular patterns have templates, listed in Category:Latin conjugation templates (for verbs) and Category:Latin declension templates (for nouns, adjectives, participles, and other parts of speech). Refer to a template's talk page for instructions and examples of use.

Quotations

 * Further guidance is given in the main article Quotations.

currently under construction

Synonyms
currently under construction

Derived terms
 Example: īnsula In Latin entries, the Derived terms section is used only for Latin words with an etymology traceable directly back to the current entry. This section should never be used for words in other languages; such words should instead be listed under a Descendants header.

The header for this section is always capitalized as "Derived terms", with only the first word in the header name capitalized. This section is an L4 header nested under a part of speech header.

This section should list each derived term alphabetically as a bulleted list. The macron-bearing form may optionally be piped into the link. For short lists, the various terms may simply be placed each on a separate line. For longer lists, the list may be broken into two columns using the templates, , and. Similar templates may be used to create three or four columns. The example below comes from the entry for.

Note that the list includes only links to entries whose etymology section would identify as the etymological origin of the term.

Derived terms may be of any part of speech. Any related terms that are not derived etymologically and directly from the current entry should instead be placed under Related terms.

Related terms
 Example: īnsulārius In Latin entries, the Related terms section is used only for Latin words with a shared etymology, and therefore usually with a spelling that is at least partially similar. This section should never be used for words of similar meaning, unless those words are related by etymology.

The header for this section is always capitalized as "Related terms", with only the first word in the header name capitalized. This section is normally an L4 header nested under a part of speech header. However, when a Latin entry has more than one part of speech to which the same list of words is related, this section is raised to L3 and placed after any L4 headers in the entry.

This section should list each related term alphabetically as a bulleted list. The macron-bearing form may optionally be piped into the link. For short lists, the various terms may simply be placed each on a separate line. For longer lists, the list may be broken into two columns using the templates, , and. Similar templates may be used to create three or four columns. The example below comes from the entry for.

Note that the list includes, the word from which derives, as well as other island-related words derived from , which are thus related to  but not derived from that word.

Related terms may be of any part of speech. Any related terms that are also derived etymologically and directly from the current entry should instead be placed under Derived terms.

Descendants
 Example: gallus In Latin entries, the Descendants section is used only for non-Latin words with an etymology traceable directly back to the Latin entry. This section should never be used for words in Latin; such words should instead be listed under a Derived terms header.

"Descendants" is a Level 4 header, nested under a part of speech header.

The Descendants section should list each descendant term alphabetically by language as a bulleted list. Names of obscure or unusual languages may be linked to their Wiktionary articles for clarification, but such linking is not necessary. National and widespread languages should never be linked. (See Translations/Wikification for more.) For short lists, the various terms may simply be placed each on a separate line. For longer lists, the list may be broken into two columns using the templates, , and. The example below comes from the entry for.

Note that the list includes only links to entries whose etymology section would identify as the direct etymological progentior of the term. Words descending from Latin derivatives of gallus should be listed on that entry and not at gallus. Borrowings from Latin words may be marked with "(borrowed)" in order to clarify the nature of the etymology. In the example above, Icelandic (a Germanic language, not descended from Latin) has borrowed the Latin word.

When linking to a page with entries in more than one language, such as galo, it is good practice to link directly to the corresponding language section. To link to the Portuguese section of, use the code * galo or the template , as * , which produces the same result. Note that this template should be used only in post-POS sections, such as Synonyms, Related terms, Derived terms, or See also.

Descendants may be of any part of speech, and may have acquired a meaning quite different from that of the Latin source word. However, in all cases Descendants are non-Latin terms. Any Latin terms that are derived from the current entry should instead be placed under Derived terms.

Latin in non-Latin entries
Besides Latin entries, Latin words frequently appear in two places within entries for words in other languages: the Translations section of English entries, as well as the Etymology section of non-Latin words derived from Latin.

Latin translations for English words

 * Further guidance is given in the main article Translations.

Latin words will appear in the Translations sections of English words. In general, only the lemma form of the Latin translation should be given, as described for each part of speech listed above.

An abbreviated table from the entry for is shown below: (Click [Show] to expand the translation table.)


 * Dutch: voorbeeld
 * Greek: παράδειγμα


 * Latin: exemplar
 * Slovene: primer

The template should be used, it speeds up entry and will enable any later, global changes in format to be made.

The syntax below will give the output in grey which follows: * Latin: mulus

The template is explained at Template_talk:t; it has the following arguments:
 * 1) la – the ISO code for Latin
 * 2) mulus – the word (its page name, without macrons)
 * 3) m – the gender: n, m, f, mf (m & f), c (the lemma applies to all three genders)
 * 4) (optional) s – the number: s for singular, or p for plural; typically this is not used for singular words
 * 5) (optional) alt=mūlus the form of the word with macrons with the prefix alt= (this is a named argument).

Note that the line actually provides links to two other entries. The text mūlus links to the entry for the Latin word mulus in the English Wiktionary. The following superscript (la)  provides a link to the entry for mulus on the Latin edition of Wiktionary (Victionarium), specifically to the relevant word should it exist there.

Two variants of the template exist. These are and. The + or - in the name indicates whether Victionarium does or does not have a corresponding entry with this name. It is not necessary to check this. A bot automatically checks the entries, so if you are not sure, you may simply use undefined and the bot will adjust the template as necessary.

Although the alt= argument is optional for proper functioning of the template, its inclusion is preferred for Latin words that include macrons in their dictionary form. This assists in the disambiguation of words such as and  when they appear as translations.

Etymology of non-Latin words
Many words in English derive from Latin. Moreover, the Romance languages (French, Italian, Romanian, Spanish, etc.) are directly descended from the Latin language, and so include many words derived from Latin ones. These words will appear in the Descendants section of the Latin entry (as described above), but the Etymology section of each of those words should also link back to the Latin word from which they descend.

The general case
A simple example from the French entry for is shown below. The syntax on the following line will give the output in grey that follows:

From nervosus:

The first template uses the parameter la to identify the word as having a Latin origin, and links to the Wikipedia article about the Latin language. This template takes two arguments: the ISO code for the language or origin, in this case la, and the ISO code for the language of the entry, in this case fr to indicate French. For English words that come from Latin, the second argument is optional (e.g. ). For all other languages, this argument is required, since the template will categorize the entry by etymology. In the example above, the template adds the entry to Category:fr:Latin derivations. Since the template builds the category name directly from the given ISO code, a missing or incorrect argument will cause to entry to be categorized incorrectly. More on the use of this template and others like it is available at Etymology/language templates.

The second template is explained at Template_talk:term. In the example above, it has the following arguments:
 * 1) nervosus – the word without macrons
 * The first argument identifies the name of the page to be linked. Since Latin entries are created without macrons in the page name, the first argument should never include macrons.
 * 1) nervōsus – the word with macrons (see "Omitting arguments" below)
 * 2) nervous – the English translation (see "Omitting arguments" below)
 * 3) lang=la – specifies the word is Latin
 * This is a named argument that ensures the link will lead to the Latin section of the target page. Technically, this argument is optional, but if it is omitted, the link will lead to the top of the target page rather than to the Latin entry on that page.  Therefore, it is better practice to include this named argument.

The first argument is required, as it is the target for the link generated by. The final, named argument lang=la should always be included as a courtesy to users, even though it is not required for the template to function. The second and third arguments are not required for the template to function, and may be omitted in some cases. Despite this, it is good practice to include them both under most circumstances.

Omitting arguments
The second (macron-bearing) argument may be omitted from the template whenever the Latin word does not use macrons. However, the English translation cannot simply be moved forward to this location. The pipe (|) that normally follows this argument must still be included if an English translation follows.

The etymology from the Portuguese entry is shown below. The syntax on the following line will give the output in grey that follows:

From vicis:

The second argument has been omitted, but the following pipe has not been dropped. The pipe cannot be dropped, or the translation would appear as the display name of the link. A space has therefore been left as a placeholder for the second argument. The space itself is not required&mdash;the two pipes may follow sequentially with no intervening space&mdash;so long as both pipe characters are included.

The third (translation) argument may reasonably be omitted whenever the meanings, of both the entry and its Latin source word, are nearly the same.

The etymology from the Romanian entry is shown below. The syntax on the following line will give the output in grey that follows:

From illusio:

The third argument has been completely omitted, including the following pipe (|). Omitting the English translation is acceptable because the Romanian and Latin words have such similar spellings and meanings ("illusion"). The etymological connection between the two words is thus readily apparent without a translation. However, in cases where the meaning differs significantly between the entry word and its Latin source word, preferred practice is to include the English translation for clarity.

Romance language verbs
In some cases, the etymology must extend a bit further. The most common case in which this happens is that of Romance language verbs. On Wiktionary, modern Romance languages use the infinitive form as the lemma, just as most print dictionaries do for those languages. Such infinitive forms derive from the Latin present active infinitive form of the verb (second principal part); however, the lemma form for Latin verbs is the first-person singular present active indicative (first principal part). As a result, linking a French, Italian, or Spanish verb to the Latin infinitive from from which it derives will link it to a non-lemma that lacks most information a user will seek. To prevent this problem from occurring, the etymology should trace the word back to a lemma form whenever possible.

The Spanish verb derives from Latin, but descends indirectly via the present active infinitive form. If the etymology for esperar merely gave spērāre as the origin, a user would be forced to follow an additional link from spērāre to get to the information on the lemma page at spērō. So, the etymology of esperar should extend one step further to the lemma form spērō.
 * Example:

The etymology from the Spanish entry is shown below. The syntax on the following line will give the output in grey that follows:

From sperare:, present active infinitive of spero:

Again, each etymology should trace the word back to a lemma form whenever possible

Help from the community
Sometimes, we know there is a problem, but don't know what to do to correct the problem. If you should find a Latin entry with a problem that you do not know how to correct, there are several ways to approach the situation.


 * 1) Mark the page with  or .  Either of these templates will add the entry to Category:Latin words needing attention, where another user can then find and correct the problem.  It helps if you include comments on the entry's talk page explaining what the problem is or why you think the page needs attention.
 * 2) Raise the issue on Wiktionary talk:About Latin.  Note that this approach is primarily for issues of style, formatting, categorization, and not for specifics of content.
 * 3) Mark the page with .  this is a more general cleanup tag, and it allows the user to include reasons or concerns as an argument in the template.  Be sure to also add an entry to WT:RFC concerning the word so that other editors will be made aware of the problem.

Other Latin aids

 * Category:Latin language
 * Category:Latin templates
 * Latin inflection templates
 * About Latin/Pronunciation
 * Wiktionary:Requested entries:Latin
 * Category:Requests (Latin)