User talk:Учхљёная

dle-IPA
Hello! I think it would be a lot easier if you made this into a module instead, like Module:hi-IPA. —suzukaze (t・c) 23:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm kinda new to coding and mostly learning as I go along, but I'll see what I can do. Учхљёная (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Constructed languages
Hi. It seems like you've been adding stuff related to your own conlang, which unfortunately doesn't meet our Criteria for Inclusion. —suzukaze (t・c) 03:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello again. Do you have evidence that people use the word eaublast? (see the rest of WT:CFI; WT:CFI.) —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 05:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Am I banned here too?
I’m not. Yay! Учхљёная (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Учхљёная (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You do have to behave here, though, or you will be. I reverted your additions to Internationale because it was obvious that you were editing in languages you know nothing about.
 * In particular, Gothic died out a thousand years before the Internationale was written. There have been attempts to revive it, but those are really a made-up imitation and Wiktionary doesn't accept them for entries or translations.
 * Don't use Wikipedias in other languages as sources for those languages, since writing an encyclopedia often requires vocabulary that has never been used in some of the older and/or less-attested languages and people have to make up words.
 * See our Criteria for inclusion for details on what is allowed. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Warning
If you continue to a) revert changes made by other users in relation to the doubted veracity of your edits without discussing it first or b) add any more content that is made up, you will be blocked. This applies equally to edits made under the account User:Учхљёнэя. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits
You have already been warned when it comes to contributing in languages you don't know as well as reverting changes "made by other users in relation to the doubted veracity of your edits without discussing it first". The edit on daleko is wrong in not one but three distinct ways; ダレコ is romanized dareko, not daleko; it is not the correct transliteration of and isn't used at all for any Japanese words but only for transliterating Slavic languages. As for Amdo Tibetan, amdotiibet is the translation to use, but Tibetan languages are not often discussed in Finnish. The Internationale translation you added despite it being reverted several times is in turn completely unsourced and unlikely to even exist. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 14:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

clum reversion
Well, can you support that by finding any recent citations at all? Equinox ◑ 02:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Not per-se, as I haven't tried yet, but another question would be this: can you find any citations that state that it's entirely obselete? -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស). 03:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC).


 * That doesn't make sense. A citation is some real text that uses the word. Citations aren't dictionaries. Equinox ◑ 05:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Recent additions
Hi. Thank you for your recent contributions. I noticed that you've been adding many terms in several languages lately, particularly in Dzongkha, Adyghe, and in Proto-Altaic. But I'm curious of where you're getting the information from; whether from (an)other external source(s) or from your knowledge of the languages. Are you proficient in these languages? And what languages other than English do you have (some) command of? Just wondering!

P.S.: I would also suggest including a language babel on your user page. Thanks!

Sincerely, 2605:3E80:1200:10:0:0:0:6C79 01:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey! So, firstly, I'd suggest you creating an account on here before engaging with me, just for any sorta accountability yourself. Secondly, I'm adapting the Dzongkha entries from a combination of some of George Van Driem's works on the topic and confirming them with a few official Bhutanese dictionaries I found online (notably the app). I do have some proficiency in Dzongkha, but I am still learning and by no means on the level of a native speaker. The sources for Proto-Altaic are listed on all the pages I create in there, often coming from an online adaptation of "An Etymological dictionary of Altaic Languages". I don't think I did very much with Adyghe stuff, but I believe I can refind the individual sources I used if it's required. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 01:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC).


 * Ah, I see. Just out of curiosity, how many languages do you have proficiency in? 2605:3E80:1200:10:0:0:0:3090 13:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe like 8? I lost count TBH. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 14:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC).
 * I guess that also includes your conlangs, correct? Or just natural languages? 2605:3E80:1200:10:0:0:0:3587 17:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Question sérieuse
Hi. According to this, you are a "certified genius". Is that really true or is that just an unproven claim by a random IP? I don't know if that's true or not, but I've also read somewhere that you're simultaneously a chemist and high school student? 93.84.114.193 14:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I have absolutely no idea what that’s about. Personally, I think I’m a dumbass, but it doesn’t really matter anyways. But yes, I am an unprofessional chemist. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 15:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC).

Adding translations
Please don't indiscriminately add translations in languages you don't know (on which subject, consider adding or some other indication of your language proficiencies to your user page): see diff. The form you added was SOP. (Populating translation tables by just adding all Wikipedia equivalents is generally a bad idea anyway, unless you verify that the form used by Wikipedia is indeed the one in common, attested use - WT:ATTEST also applies to translation tables.) — Mnemosientje (t · c) 11:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

slim
Hello. You reverted my edit to. Did you intend to do so ? Leasnam (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey! I did intend to do so, as I assumed it was a descendant that got miscategorized, but I was mistaken and corrected my reversion. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 23:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC).
 * No worries. Cheers ! Leasnam (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Reverting module edits
Reverting people's edits in modules is a very bad idea because cascading edits can cause modules errors. Those etym-only codes were added by me yesterday, while I'm working with other editors to improve the Turkic tree. If you have concerns about people's edits to modules, ask them on their talk page. -- 02:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I literally just did that. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 02:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC).
 * No, what you did was revert my edits, which again, bad idea when you have no clue what you're doing. -- 02:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

redirects
If you move a page and the redirect shouldn't exist, please tag it with for speedy deletion. Ultimateria (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Please look at the page’s history, it’s a weird situation. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 17:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC).
 * I assume you're talking about ཡུ་ནའིཊེཊ་སི་ཊེསི, but I was actually referring to སྔ་དུས་གོང་མའི་ཨིང་ལིཤ་ཁ, ཨར་ཇེན་ཊི་ན, and others in your recent contributions. Are these alternative forms or are they mistakes? Ultimateria (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, yeah, those were mistakes, sorry. -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 17:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries, just tag them in the future. Ultimateria (talk) 20:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

"Black Mountain Monpa"
"ole" is the code for "Olekha", please fix your entries. DTLHS (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Got impatient and dealt with it myself. — Eru·tuon 22:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

རྒིལ་འག་སྨེ་ཡེར
Since I was about to do it before you blocked me, could you please add an apostrophe before "meyer" in the head-transliteration on རྒིལ་འག་སྨེ་ཡེར, so that it looks like "gilga-'meyer"? Much thanks! -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 21:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC).

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 19:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Dzongkha transliterations
I'm just going to revert you every time you change Dzongkha transliterations to the Van Driem system. If you want to change it, then you can get consensus at the WT:Beer parlour and write a module which implements this automatically. What you will not do is manually disable transliterations and then write them in next to the links, because it's (a) completely impossible to maintain in a reasonable way, (b) not something anyone else has agreed to, and (c) obviously trying to circumvent consensus, even though you've known for a long time that we don't use that system. This is not the first time you’ve done this, and you've been blocked for doing things like this before. Theknightwho (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)