User talk:115.77.147.4

Edits
So yeah Sinology is fun and all, but Sinocentrism isn't. Seeing your edits, I think you don't know much about Chinese historical linguistics and your knowledge on Vietnamese historical linguistics is non-existent, as often is the case with those who made this kind of edits. I strongly suggest that if you actually want to contribute to Wiktionary and to Vietnamese entries in particular (and not just be like one of those typical Sinocentric researchers who are simply ignorant about Southeast Asia linguistics, unfortunately quite common in Vietnam), you should read a bit more papers about Chinese and Vietnamese historical linguistics, as well as comparative linguistics in general. I can recommend stuff like Norman (1988)'s Chinese, Sagart (1999)'s the Roots of Old Chinese, Kwok (2018)'s Southern Mǐn, as well as South Coblin's various papers on Chinese "dialectology"; on the Austroasiatic side, you can see the reconstructions of various Austroasiatic branches here, you can also read the Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages for a more recent book on Austroasiatic in general. PhanAnh123 (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)