User talk:118.236.75.164

Shortage of decent admins is obvious
SemperBlotto (talk) is an admin? Really? I can't believe it.

See the useless revisions by SemperBlotto, for example, renewable energy.

-- 118.236.75.164 08:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC) -- 118.236.75.164 08:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what your problem is, but we don't need editors who are willing to abuse admins over something so little. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 08:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

How did I "abuse admins"?

What is "so little"?

Actually, SemperBlotto and S URJECTION are abusing me.

Actually, SemperBlotto and S URJECTION removed all of my edit without reasonable excuse, as if both are the same person.

See the useless renewable energy revisions by SemperBlotto and S URJECTION.

-- 118.236.75.164 09:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I have not touched the entry before I noticed in the recent changes list. "so little" is the definition of a single entry; "abuse admins" by constantly spamming their talk page fully knowing that they're not active 24/7 and implying that SemperBlotto's actions would make them not an "decent admin". Honestly, if I had the choice between the one-line entry and that three-line entry, I would've taken the same action - the one with three lines is inferior in basically every single way. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 10:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Besides: "Biomass is not renewable resources." How is vegetation not a renewable resource (even compared to coal or oil, which are renewable in the most pointless sense in that they take specific conditions and a long time)? As for "resources that is used as renewable energy and converted into renewable electricity can be defined as renewable resource", I fail to see how that affects anything - renewable energy collected from that electricity is still renewable energy. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 10:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)