User talk:128.84.126.155

Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/hundą‎‎
First of all, rfv is for asking for evidence that a term is attested in actual use- which, by definition, is wrong for a proto-language. As for your question: the usage note was about the Proto-Germanic term, not about any non-Germanic cognates. If you're not satisfied with that answer, you could post your question on the talk page, or you could use a more appropriate template (I think rfv-etymology would be best- use the "+" in the box it generates to post a topic at the Etymology scriptorium). Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 03:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)