User talk:175.193.153.88

That's not how to resolve RFVs. I've restored it. Equinox ◑ 18:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Bye then. Come back when you've read and understood our policies, if you can read. You have shown little evidence so far. Equinox ◑ 18:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

The user Equinox is abusing his administrative authority.
On the Discussion page of the entry glow-up, I provided sources to prove the entry's admissibility to Wiktionary according to all rules of this site. On the first page of Google, you can see the phrase is used by many notable YouTubers with million of subscribers and well-known sites such as Buzzfeed, Reddit, Pinterest, and many blogs, over the course of many years. Still, the user Equinox let his feelings cloud his judgment and deleted the evidence and blocked me. I will do everything until the user Equinox gets sanctions for his administrative abuse of powers. Wiktionary and Wikipedia have rules and he violated many of them with this abuse of authority. He is an angry INTJ that should never be given any authority. He can't control his emotions. He is poison that hinders Wiktionary's growth.
 * The rules regarding admissibility to Wiktionary are in our Criteria for inclusion, and they make it very clear that websites are irrelevant. Also, removing the rfv template doesn't accomplish anything, since the fate of the entry is determined at Requests for verfication/English. Making up stuff about the rules of the site won't help, either, since all the admins and regular contributors already know the rules. Finally, the version of the unblock-ip template here doesn't use the second or third parameters, so you just wasted your time copypasting 71 admin user names into your talk page- all for a 3-hour block which has already expired. Please learn something about the rules before you waste anyone else's time. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)