User talk:2.27.73.173

mixed language entries, if you want them to be kept

 * 1) A standard Mandarin entry should exist before a mixed entry is created.
 * 2) The entry should follow the format as in Planck常数, nothing extra
 * 3) Do it right or don't do it at all. You also have your pinyin entries where you can work uninterrupted.

--Anatoli 12:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I can also offer you that if you start creating proper Mandarin entries (e.g. and  before mixed language entries, e.g. Banach空间 (but no city, river names please), I promise to provide you with enough guidance and fix any mistakes. It's not a problem to have honest mistakes and it's not as hard as it seems. Try doing something right for a change, write in Chinese! You are of course, welcome to take part in the vote. If it doesn't pass, it only means that another vote will be needed. --Anatoli 23:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Independence
Re: Citations:Banach空间: Citations need to be independent. Two citations from the same author do not count as two but rather as one. --Dan Polansky 14:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, as far as I can tell, the first is a citation of Banach 空间结构理論:, the second of Banach空间选论: and the third of Banach 空间结构理論: - so what is the point of this page? SemperBlotto 14:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You seem to be saying that repeating the book title is not a citation, and that the citation should rather be of a sentence from the book, right? --Dan Polansky 14:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That was my understanding. However, in this case the book titles seem to be different from the term being cited (but I can't read Mandarin, so could be wrong). SemperBlotto 14:29, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The book title seems to contain the term: one of the book titles is "Banach空间选论" while the term in question is "Banach空间", which is a subterm. The other book title is "Banach 空间结构理論", which again contains the term "Banach空间" but for the space between "Banach" and "空间". I don't know how much difference a space makes in Mandarin.
 * I agree that sentences from books are better than book titles, but book titles also use terms to convey meaning, so could be okay.
 * If you undelete Citations:Banach空间 and delete Banach空间, citations can be collected and adjusted in Citations:Banach空间. --Dan Polansky 14:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have restored the citation page. I'll let you adjust its contents. I know nothing of Chinese languages - would the quoted titles also be citations for Banach空: (if that means anything)?
 * That's a good point with "Banach空". Given that 空间 is entered into Wiktionary as "space; open air; sky", the thesis that Banach空间 refers to Banach space seems superficially plausible to a non-Mandarin speaker, unlike the same thesis for "Banach空". In any case, this can be properly judged by one of our Mandarin-speaking admins. --Dan Polansky 14:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Translation
You have entered this quotation to "Banach空间": "[...] 接受日期: 2007 - 0 肛 19 日寮自然种学基金( T 柱号: 1057109 们和高伎博士点基金(批准号: 2 叨 0 叨 55010 )姨助项日拷卖证明了 AL -空间和 Banach 空间单位球面 [...]". Can you translate that quotation to English on this talk page? --Dan Polansky 15:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)