User talk:213.113.49.34

"I have no idea what you are referring to by WMF"
Why not use an online dictionary, like Wiktionary? WMF: It's the. You're really coming across as someone who actively wants to upset us all. Maybe a little good faith? Or are you the mystery shopper? Equinox ◑ 16:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * WMF could mean a million things (how many things, I'd not know) ...and how does the meaning of "Wikimedia Foundation", make any sense, in that sentence? What does the sentence mean, given that meaning of WMF? How does it make any sense? I certainly can't make heads nor tails of it.
 * "You're really coming across as someone who actively wants to upset us all."
 * So you're assuming bad faith, on my part, based on absolutely nothing, then?
 * "Maybe a little good faith?"
 * Someone who assumes bad faith, has no right to say that. I abhor hypocrisy, BTW.
 * Furthermore: To quote from Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith: "Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it."
 * In the case of User:DCDuring (and, if you check User_talk:Eirikr, also User:Eirikr) there is clear evidence to the contrary. Very clear.
 * If you look at what I have written... There is no such evidence, whatsoever. I am civil. I make arguments. No insults, no accusations, no dishonesty, no (certainly not intentional) fallacies. Nothing that would indicate bad faith, or an assumption of bad faith, or any other kind of bad behaviour.
 * ...as you, yourself, also implicitly admit, given that you merely make a baseless accusation, and don't even try to show basis for why I so much as look like I'm acting in bad faith, in any way, whatsoever. That is not the act of an honest actor. If you're going to make an accusation, you have to back it up. Slander isn't an argument, nor is it evidence.
 * I just checked the list of admins. I was disappointed to see both your and Eirikr's names, on it. This is not behaviour I'd expect, from admins.
 * I'd expect admins to not go against WP:ASSUME or WT:Civility, and to actually back up their claims. Do that, and I'm willing to interact with you. If not, then you're clearly not someone willing to have a meaningful/constructive conversation, not someone interested in honest debate, making any discussion with you, utterly pointless.
 * ...and if that happens and you and Eirikr are indicative of admins here, I'll probably just give up on Wiktionary, as a completely hopeless lost cause, that is beyond help.
 * Oh, and BTW: Here's a saying I'm rather fond of, that is rather relevant (it's a bit "uncivil", perhaps, but... Well, I didn't invent it): "Put up, or shut up."--213.113.49.34 17:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I think I'd be ready to request an IBAN were it not for the other guy being anonymous. DCDuring (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)