User talk:2405:204:948C:76E6:0:0:23A4:18AD

Proto-Indo-European /ḱ/ has given rise to /ć/ in Proto-Indo-Iranian whereas PIE /ǵʰ/ gave rise to PII /ȷ́ʰ/. The transition of PIE /ḱ/ to PII /ȷ́ʰ/ is hence unexplained.
 * I've read arguments that /ȷ́ʰ/ in PII arose as a dialectical variant. All the reflexes support it too, so it must be the explanation. —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 16:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

that may well be so but I think at least a mention should be made of this irregularity. By not pointing out that what's here is not what we expected, we may confuse the reader who isn't as familiar with etymology as some contributors here are. We may lead the reader to believe /ḱ/ always gives /jh/ just an opinion 2405:204:9387:50DE:591D:8A26:4534:6AD6 15:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)