User talk:2600:100B:B00B:E5A3:0:62:F650:2101

Hi, I've a few questions for you. Why did you not tell me I was acting like a full-blown addict before I got blocked last October for those inaccurate Chinese entries? Was I even acting like a full-blown addict, prior to when I first mismade those entries???

Remember, I'm very good at spotting an entry that needs a category or an etymology added, and it's my understanding that quitting cold turkey will never make those category or rfe additions happen any faster.

Besides, does it really "require expertise" in each language, or even proficiency in that language, to simply add something like rfe or Category:cs:Male family members?? As long as the definition's already there, and you know that words meaning "uncle" (whether maternal or paternal, or even as specific as "mother's older brother" and "father's younger sister's husband") belong in "Male family members", then adding those categories shouldn't be too disruptive.

And regarding "poor judgement": yes, I know I should at least be waiting 90 days before using the same device, or perhaps find a new device such as a library computer to do all my evasions (which is out of the question for me, since I live in a rural area and can't drive). And I was not foolish enough to think that you would not catch me block-evading; I just knew it might not get noticed as quickly/easily by you, since my recent evasions were made while I was on vacation in Oklahoma, and I live in Virginia. Yes, I know I was using the same devices as usual. I just want you to know that while I was on vacation in Arizona earlier this year, I edited Candelario (among a few other pages, none of which were CJKV, I think) yet nobody seemed to notice or care enough to block that IP range.

Lastly: Let's say that (for one reason or another) some other WT admin decides to unblock my main account Shāntián Tàiláng. What do you think is the worst that could happen? In other words, what do you fear the most about my account being unblocked? Because I know it wouldn't be "block evasion". (And "that nameless admin being foolish/rogue/hacked enough to unblock other, more abusive/disruptive accounts" doesn't count.)

Regards, 2600:100B:B00B:E5A3:0:62:F650:2101 18:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)