User talk:2600:8805:2200:1C80:38A9:D09D:398A:1D6

fever swamp
"NPOV" doesn't mean "pretend that differences aren't there": you wouldn't change the definition of "black" to include white people. NPOV just means that the definition shouldn't make a judgement (so "right-wingers" is fine, but "right-wingers, who by the way are bad people" is not). Equinox ◑ 16:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Considering the term "fever swamp" is pejorative (and even marked as as such), the unjustified assignment of it to one side or the other is very much POV. You say that I pretended the differences aren't there.  I believe you are pretending they ARE there.  Would I be justified in changing all the right-wing references to left-wing?  And, of course, I wouldn't change the definition of "black" include white people.  However, you wouldn't suggest that the definition of "people" didn't include whites, would you?  2600:8805:2200:1C80:38A9:D09D:398A:1D6 16:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Re "unjustified assignment", we describe words, we don't pass judgement on whether they are justifiably used or not. In this case, is used for specifically right-wing ideologies. Please see WT:NOT. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 17:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)