User talk:62.147.58.92

Timonisms
Thanks for the quote. Do consider using which does all the formatting for you, and avoids using ugly footnotes. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the tip. But the template only does the date-author-work part. The "ugly footnotes" seem absolutely essential to me so as to provide real sourcing (i.e. journal/volume/issue or ISBN, etc., page number, link to online copy at Google Books or Archive.org, etc.) and offload all that data down the page in a note. So I think I'll need footnotes even with the template. 62.147.58.92 21:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)