User talk:62.155.158.51

Unblock
There is nothing incriminating in and a staggering lack of impartialness when User:Sgconlaw demands that as far as possible we require information such as etymologies to be referenced (per WT:ETY) but, for example, "It's fine without a source as long as it works, and has parallels" (Thadh, Etymology_scriptorium/2023/December) and Leasnam get's a free pass every time (ibid., ) because they are doing so much "good work". It looks like eventually you are doing so much good work, you don't have the time check and reevaluate the blocks that you deal out, the irony being that I was just talking about "Censorship" and warning against speculation. Surely it has a smack of putting the troll back in patroller. 62.155.158.51 09:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC)