User talk:71.232.14.147

Re: "Original Research"
While we do try to provide references for etymologies, we're not Wikipedia, and we don't have the same hard line against all original research. As long as speculation is labeled as such, it's not reason in itself to merit removal. That said, the etymology you removed was pretty lame, so I didn't revert you. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up 71.232.14.147 14:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)