User talk:Adrian de Jong

Earthian
Word already exist. --Koppadasao (talk) 10:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes it does exist in its very narrow definition, from an extraterrestrial's point of view all single or multi-celled organisms are earthians. This is the view point expressed by an extraterrestrial in Star Trek the NG who pointed out to Captain Picard as he dipped his hand into a pond of slime of single celled life forms or earthians. An Earthian's full meaning was never expressed as earthian or earthians just implied in Star Trek the  NG  Adrian de Jong (talk) 13:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Narrow definition?
 * Of or from the planet Earth.
 * Wouldn't that include any single or multicellular organism? One of the quotes even includes a multicellular organism, a metallurgist.
 * --Koppadasao (talk) 13:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * a metallurgist?


 * a fully expanded definition, of this universe -- my paradigm.


 * If we went to the extreme, every hydrogen atom in this universe is a single celled organism and every element, molecular structure and/or planetary/star configuration within this universe is a multi-celled organism, a reactive based organism, following the Laws of Newton, chemistry and nuclear physics, so we could say their universians.


 * Universians are the building block used to construct a living single or multi-celled organism. The distinction between an universian and a life form is that a life form is capable of recognizing when it is wounded and works to repair itself.


 * I do agree with Einstein, energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only be converted from one form to another. Who or what is doing the converting from one form to another is what I consider cause point, its what makes universians constructed objects organic, alive and self-motivated organisms.


 * The cause point uses the subatomic butterfly effect (thoughts) to initiate movement. All subatomic and atomic physical phenomena follows Newton's laws of motion. PS It's another aspect of relativity I need to write and publish.


 * Miracles don't exist, there is only black holes of no understanding of how and what occurred - occurs within our knowledge base. PS galaxies may be reactive based stelar living organisms and dark matter an attempted explanation of the accumulated effects of the cause point or points. "a paradigm"


 * In quantum mechanics the creator (the converter from one form to another) is called the observer. Adrian de Jong (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * PS how would this fit into wiki


 * inalienable rights for all earthians.


 * to accept into or reject from their personal space other earthians and/or physical objects. (being successful is not the issue)
 * to discover their function/purpose to self, family, friends, nation, all earthians and/or the physical/spiritual universes.
 * to connect with teachers, sources and walk their path to fully learn what it would take to assume those responsibilities.
 * to assume those responsibilities as needed to assist self, family, friends nation, all earthians and/or the physical/spiritual universes.
 * to recognize all earthians live by their own accepted paradigms.


 * I refer to the spiritual universe to be the observer's universe in quantum mechanics. Adrian de Jong (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I think you need to read a bit more.--Koppadasao (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * LOL Maybe you need to examine your basic paradigms


 * For me wisdom is
 * The ability to wake up and distinguish between self generated illusions and delusions and what is universally there.
 * Recognize … “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.” Albert Einstein
 * Recognize …”Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Albert Einstein
 * Recognize … “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough." Albert Einstein
 * Recognize … “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” Albert Einstein
 * Best Wishes Adrian de Jong (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * And some basic writing and editing skills…--Koppadasao (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * LOL I completely agree, sometimes my enthusiasm needs to be curbed by putting me on a short leash, I do suffer from a form of word and letter dyslexia. Adrian de Jong (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi thank you for responding to my communication, I am new to wiki.

These are some questions I have looked into and developed paradigms for.

1. how to explain in layman's terms electron clouds when changing state travel faster then the speed of light?

2. Every cell has a set of survival imperatives. How do they translate these imperatives into abilities to delay their extinction?

3. How are social viruses (implanted paradigms) maintained and transmitted? "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralysis the social development of those who follow it." Churchill W.

4. What valuable function/reason do humans (one species of earthian) serve that keeps earthians (the majority) from driving humans extinct?

5. What makes it important for humans to refer to the majority of earthians as staff, a symbiotic relationship?

6. What exists to make "reality" a persistent illusion? How does this existence affect/cause inertia? "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein

7. What is essential to maintaining a religious belief?

8. When does faith/religion end for an individual and a secular understanding of their existence begin?

9. Are feminine imperatives similar or different from masculine imperatives?

10. What are the consequences from masculine imperatives dominating and preventing the feminine imperatives to be realized within society?

Best Wishes Adrian de Jong (talk) 17:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You should go to wikia.com, they may have something you're qualified to edit.--Koppadasao (talk) 17:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Everything you've mentioned so far is outside the scope of a dictionary. We're only concerned with defining terms and telling how they're pronounced, and that sort of thing- we're not the right tool for what you want to do. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Chuck, you have an impressive resume posted. Adrian de Jong (talk) 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)