User talk:Arpcom

The entry for sportpony is not well-formatted. Furthermore, it is not clear that "sportpony" is a term that is in wide use from the kinds of sources that we use for demonstrating use and meaning. "sport pony" might be a better entry, but still might not meet our criteria for inclusion (See WT:CFI). Our methods and goals are somewhat differ in important details from Wikipedia's. "Official" definitions not supported by demonstrable actual usage in that sense often don't survive our reviews. I'd be happy to work with you to help you make good new entries for horse- and riding-related terms and to improve the ones we already have. DCDuring TALK 01:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)