User talk:DCDuring/List of sequenced animal genone/List of sequenced animal genomes 2016

How is this an appropriate appendix for a dictionary? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I was thinking the same thing --Stubborn Pen (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: January–August 2016
Doesn't seem like an appropriate dictionary page. DCD's gonna have some strong arguments for keeping, though --Stubborn Pen (talk) 23:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It has two funtions:
 * yet another list of taxa that might appear in books and articles
 * a target for links from the entries, which link also served to mark the taxa as modern model organisms.
 * About 35 taxon entries link to it. Fewer than 50 of the taxa in the Appendix have entries.
 * ✅ The first function is served just about as well if it were a user page, especially now that we have Redlink dumps ✅.
 * ✅ The second function could be served better by linking to the corresponding WP appendix, which is actively maintained and seems to have 50% more entries.
 * IOW, I don't really care, but would like to have enough time to replace the links with WP links. DCDuring TALK 02:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Move to userspace and replace links with links to the (better) version at Wikipedia. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The redirect page at Appendix:List of sequenced animal genomes can be deleted when the discussion is complete. DCDuring TALK 02:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved (some time ago, and I just deleted the redirect). - -sche (discuss) 10:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately it's too big for WT:BJAODN, but it sounds ideal for it. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)