User talk:Deutschland1871

Proto-Nostratic
Deutschland1871, fringe theories like Proto-Nostratic and Proto-Altaic are banned from the project. --4 18:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Bruh, it is not a Proto-Nostratic and Proto-Altaic and it is not a theory. It is not banned across Wiktionary at an official level and it is just a speculation at best not connected to any of those fringe theories. I actually talk to the person who made this and he gave me a solid reason. This is not solid enough and almost nonesensical. You have to give me a better reason other then trying to connected two unrekated things seemingly to spread your influence. (Deutschland1871 (talk) 20:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC))8
 * See Votes/2019-01/Banning Altaic. Claiming PST and PNC  are of cognates of PIE  *is*, and such theories are deleted on sight. --  20:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * And if you're referring to User:Gnosandes, he has been warned many times about adding fringe theories and blocked several times. -- 20:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, some nonsense. The Proto-Nostratic does not include the families PST and PNEC. Yes, there is no PNC family there, there is a PNEC family there. And what does Proto-Nostratic have to do with it at all? Also, no kinship was assumed there, because even the templates used noncog, but not cog. I didn't add PST at all. You again came up with some nonsense and assigned it to your opponent, who did not do it. Do I really have to give an example of entries for the Proto-Turkic? And yes, you will have to change the etymology of the wordform . As always, you are wrong about fringe theories. The Valence Theory explains the Balto-Slavic paradigmatic accent system with great success. This is confirmed in the remarks for *ṓja, after that, judging by the actions, Rua refuses Derksen's law, which is ad hoc. Gnosandes (talk) 00:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I said fringe theories like Proto-Nostratic and Proto-Altaic and in my removal of the text, I cited Proto-World in the comment, which is what this entry was claiming. I'm not going to argue with you on the validity of your beliefs -- that's already played out and you've been blocked in the past for them. -- 02:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * But why did you talk about it when it's just not there? You have confused everything again, these are not theories, but hypotheses (Nostratic and Altaic). What makes you think that I support these hypotheses at all? Are you going to think for me? What other validity of my beliefs? Are you going to delete such information in ? Do you happen to see the tricks of the Altaic hypothesis here or ? In a word, you again came up with some nonsense and assigned it to another person. Gnosandes (talk) 03:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, it is not a theory but a hypothesis. The Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Northwest Caucasian Urheimats are close geograpically heck even the Proto- Kartvelian Wikipedia page suggests a distant common ancestor between Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Kartvelian. You just want to rule this wiki. It is not your wiki, it is the people's wiki. Your abusing your rights.(Deutschland1871 (talk) 04:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC))

This is not based on Proto-World. He based it off of evidence. I'm defending Gnosandes edit. In fact, this edit was here before him so back off.(Deutschland1871 ([[User talk:Deutschland1871|talk]e people's]) 20:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC))

And he told me it was not based on a fringe theory of any sort.(Deutschland1871 (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC))

Formatting
Deutschland1871, you are malformatting entry etymologies. Please see WT:STYLE and WT:REF before you continue or you may face a block of your account. -- 20:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC) What do ypu mean by malformatting?