User talk:Dictionman

Hi there. All of your entries need formatting properly. See the following welcome links. SemperBlotto 08:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

bohemian
Shouldn't that be Bohemian, not bohemian? Can you provide citations to attest that sense? (see WT:CFI). --EncycloPetey 00:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, my mistake, it should be under Bohemian not bohemian could you move it for me? --Dictionman 22:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The definition "a Gypsy" already exists on that page. --EncycloPetey 00:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

kama
Here again, shouldn't the definition you added go under Kama, not kama? Wiktionary is case-sensitive. If a word is always capitalized, then it should be given an entry under that capitalization. --EncycloPetey 00:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Again; sorry, my mistake. I will try to be more case-sensitive in my contributions. Sorry if I am bothering you.
 * I'd much rather be helping someone willing to learn than combatting vandalism :) --EncycloPetey 01:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry to bother you again, but I have a question, as text does not contain intonation or sarcasm, I am unsure whether you are pleased to help me as I am willing to learn, or that you are implying that I am a vandal. I mean no insult, just clarification of expression. --Dictionman 01:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The smiley ) at the end was to let you know I was being friendly and pleased to help you. --EncycloPetey 01:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Just making sure. And sorry to bother you again. :) --Dictionman 01:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

subpoena ad testificandum
You haven't given it a ===part of speech=== section. And your plural doesn't look right. SemperBlotto 17:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The plural should be subpoenas ad testificandum not subpoena ad testificandums. How do you edit the en-noun section to do that? --Dictionman 17:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I've done it for you. Don't worry about the red link - it'll get done one day. SemperBlotto 17:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) --Dictionman 17:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)