User talk:I'm so meta even this acronym/Deleted appendix for protologisms by topic

It is to be hoped that scientists, inventors, and manufacturers will make extensive use of this Page because it is an excellent opportunity to "try out" ideas and concepts, which have not existed until now because of lack of a name invented for them, but which once conceptualized could, with the assistance of further thinkers beyond the first logurge(word-inventor), result in the development of products, services or behavior which provide benefits for everybody.Tokerdesigner 20:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: June–July 2014
I would like to delete everything under Appendix:List of protologisms by topic and Appendix:List of protologisms by topic. If these were in use at all, they would merely be encyclopedic. bd2412 T 21:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete (even the parent WT:LOP should probably go, in my opinion); or transwiki to Urban Dictionary, heh. Equinox ◑ 14:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Moreover, I still support the failed vote: Votes/pl-2013-09/Deleting list of protologisms. If there are people who have not voted, please vote in that vote, and indent your vote using ":" and say "Late vote" or the like, so we can have an idea where the consensus is going. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete from me as well, and while I agree that the LOP is in general quite useless, I would rather not edit an inactive vote page. — Keφr 20:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * : What about posting to a new section "Late support" that would be created at Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2013-09/Deleting list of protologisms? --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I put a link back to this discussion there, which I think should suffice. — Keφr 20:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, because I don't like the Appendix very much anyway. Rædi Stædi Yæti  {- skriv til mig -} 20:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 14:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)