User talk:Jean KemperN

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! Mglovesfun (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

strict implication
You are welcome to create a page such as User:Jean KemperN/strict implication but Talk:strict implication should be used for discussing the Wiktionary entry for the term. (If you think the entry is bad, I'm afraid you'll have to speak in simpler terms to be understood). Conrad.Irwin 20:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I moved the contents of that talk page back to your userspace, please do not put them back on the talk page. Please see Conrad's note above.  The content you had added to the talk page has little to do with the entry in question and is not at all clear. -  21:55, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * See above. Equinox ◑ 01:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

(Jean KemperN 16:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC))Thank you