User talk:Latisc

Comparatives and superlatives
Could you please stop creating those robotically? is not attested on Google Books. Canonicalization (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I’m very sorry, I’ll be more careful next time. I marked both pages for deletion. Latisc (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * BTW, you should now use and  to create comparative and superlative adverbs. Benwing2 (talk) 01:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Using the language tag in pronunciation entries
Hello Latisc! I see that you've been adding IPA pronunciations to a number of entries lately. When you do this, remember to use the correct language code in the IPA template: for a German word like Waisenhaus, that means using IPA|de|/ˈvaɪ̯zn̩ˌhaʊ̯s/ rather than using "la" after the IPA part. When you use the IPA|la| pronunciation template, it causes the pronunciation to be miscategorized as a Latin pronunciation!--Urszag (talk) 10:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I’m sorry, I didn’t realize I was using the incorrect language code. Thank you for telling me, though. Latisc (talk) 11:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Recently, Benwing's bot has been automatically updating pages with that IPA template so that it consistently takes a language code as its first parameter. I think that this format is supposed to be more consistent with the format of other templates, such as "audio"; that might help you remember it. I think I've fixed all of the pronunciations that had been put into the Latin categories. Don't worry, I've also made mistakes like this. --Urszag (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Aussprachedateien
Hallo Latisc, könntest Du bitte bei Neuanlage eines Lemmas prüfen, ob eine Aussprachedatei existiert und nicht automatenhaft die Vorlage benutzen. Beispielsweise existieren Vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung. Jeuwre 11ː23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * für Sanitätswesen
 * für Sanitätsoffizier
 * für Stabsarzt
 * für Rationalität.
 * Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich wusste nicht, dass Aussprachedateien für nichtexistierende Begriffe schon existieren. Darauf werde ich in Zukunft achten. Latisc (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail
Hello ,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

accelerated creation of incorrect non-lemma forms
Hi. I notice you have created quite a lot of non-lemma forms for German nouns. Many of them are wrong; e.g. Nerden per all dictionaries is not a valid form of Nerd. You are a native speaker of German so I'm surprised you don't notice the mistakes. I would recommend not doing this in the future. Benwing2 (talk) 02:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Benwing2, thanks for letting me know. I probably used my tool that automatically adds inflection tables, since applying it again yields the same result. Sorry for not having checked the forms afterwards. I will better do it manually from now on. --Latisc (talk) 09:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

body
Could you please give a source ? ПростаРечь (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * See (the entry does not provide a source either). --Latisc (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)