User talk:Methodology

Hello,

I have recently been acquainting myself with this site and like what I see.

My Amgine support
The reason for my support is simple. I read the first against augment that was made, following the evidence provided and thought that it was a load of nonsense.

He then threatened to block me


 * Where was this threat made? I followed the link, but I don't see the threat. Even if he had, Primetime kept removing the rfv tag, so I would have been in support of the block threat.

So I gave my support, to counter the nonsense against argument. I did consider removing my support when more against arguments started to show up, but after I got your message I am going to keep my support vote.

Thanks, Gerard Foley 07:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Thank you for responding. It now sounds as though you are leaving a "support" vote to spite me. Why would my last message to you cause you to not vote solely on the basis of what you think is the best thing for this project? Am I more important than this project? Methodology 14:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

I am not keeping my support vote just to spite you, but you have started a campaign against Amgine and I have noticed that your only contributions are to oppose Amgine. I have simply started to have doubts about the oppose votes so I am keeping my support until the negative comments are more persuasive. Thanks, Gerard Foley 18:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Cartman vote
That vote was by an anonymous user. (I should have explained) SemperBlotto 22:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Wiktionary History
Hey Methodology,

I apologize, because it turns out I was wrong about how long Connel has been contributing to Wiktionary. I double-checked his history and it looks like he's been here since November, 2004 instead of November, 2005. Your remaining corrections to his list are correct, though.

It appears as if you've won the argument decisively.

Excellent job,

Primetime 08:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)