User talk:Montanastan

multiplexural
The entry you created seems to have been a protologism and has been deleted. If you are sure that it is a real word, please provide evidence of this word being used in durably archived media (mainly printed books, and usenet groups) as required by our inclusion criteria. For a term to be included, it must be used by at least three different authors, spaced in time by at least three years, and the authors must not merely be explaining the word's meaning. If you can find any such quotations, please add them to. --EncycloPetey 21:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

it may be a protologic, but that does neither to deny it has real meaning Or of practical benefit in using based completely upon Latin, it is most likely it has pragmatic, semantic and syntactical value in addition to any dictionary and the exclusion reflects a narrowness of the broad principles language is devised to encompass to the self-serving ends of pop-culture
 * There is a site called Urban Dictionary that caters to such protologisms. You may wish to post there.  Wiktionary requires attestation as outlined in WT:CFI, rather than including newly created words that are not yet used anywhere. --EncycloPetey 22:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)