User talk:Msh210/Archive/tmr

Template:tmr
Why exactly is supposed to be used everywhere except etymologies? Does this also apply to the other various dialects of Aramaic? If so, should the other templates also be deleted? --Yair rand 23:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Dunno; dunno; and, assuming the hypothesis, I guess so. But to clarify the first "dunno", that seems the way it's been done, by 334a and everyone else. &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 17:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

tmr
Is there a reason that you created instead of ? Do we not treat it as a separate language? --Bequw → τ 19:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Apparently not: I've seen others (including 334a) add tmr entries using "Aramaic" and template:arc, and I've followed their lead. I don't know of anyone who's added entries using "Jewish Babylonian Aramaic" or template:tmr (except maybe myself at some point). &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 16:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. I've noted it at Wiktionary talk:Language treatment. Maybe someone else will know. --Bequw → τ 18:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)