User talk:Rforqs

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:


 * Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
 * If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
 * If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.

You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

corr from *kerp-?
Hi, who traces back to ? That's not what Matasović says; he says the PC is and is possibly related to  and. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 18:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Oops, thank you! I'm going off my notes from Shcrijver, and I think I copied it down wrong. The semantic connection plus an earlier edit associating corrán with *kerp- didn't help me catch that either. I'll remove that and wait for someone with more experience in PIE to make the appropriate recon page.

Rforqs (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Primitive Irish declension tables
Do we actually know enough about Primitive Irish paradigms to supply entire declension tables? I don't think that speculation is appropriate for an attested language. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Primitive Irish is just barely attested. However there is a lot of certainty regarding the nominal and adjectival paradigms that necessarily existed at that period. It particularly bugged me that the vocative case and dual number had been left out so far in previous templates when we know they were there and know their values. I'm willing to debate wether or not such reconstructions are appropriate for a language like Primitive Irish but at the moment I don't see anything wrong with reconstructions so long as they're appropriately marked. Rforqs (talk) 04:47, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I really feel that we shouldn't have declension tables for Primitive Irish, since we know so little about it other than what we reconstruct backward from Old Irish and forward from PIE. Most of the existing tables were created by the now banned User:ÞunoresWrǣþþe, who had kind of a weird obsession with reconstructing barely attested medieval languages. —Mahāgaja · talk 10:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , would you please handle this? Given your expertise in the subject matter and the user who created the templates, I'd be comfortable with sending them to RFDO or just deleting them out of process. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * see WT:RFDO. —Mahāgaja · talk 21:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Section level
Please make Declension and Descendants sections level 4. Thanks. -- 03:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

1 in desctree
Please don't use 1 in desctree. That parameter is not intended for use. -- 03:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)