User talk:Slavuj~enwiktionary

Croatian
Please use Serbo-Croatian as the language header for entries instead of Bosnian/Serbian/Croatian. Thanks. User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 21:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Linguistically speaking, Kajkavian is as distant from "Croatian" as it is from "Serbian". Wiktonary's Serbo-Croatian rules have been abundantly explained to you under other suckpuppets of yours, so stop wasting everyone's time. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet? Of whom? Can we confirm this? If so can we not ban for abuse of multiple accounts, or something...? User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 02:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ,, , . He's writing in a unique mixture of normal Serbo-Croatian and some obscure and archaic words, just like.
 * Previous blocked were triggered by 1) insulting and hate speech 2) repeated addition of bizarre spellings that even Google can't find. His recent edits are OK. If Wonderfool can edit so can he :P He even (unknowingly) collaborated with a nationalist from the "other side" on the entry - the cutest demonstration of invisible hand I have seen so far at Wiktionary. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 02:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh, whatever...I guess that's fair enough, but Wonderfool is a rather different and potentially (at least IMO) a very much more frustrating case. Sure I guess he's not an issue if he doesn't become an admin again, but yeah, I've seen some blocking at least (supposed) sockpuppets of WF. Whether or not they were leaving another active account of theirs unbanned or not I don't know...User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 02:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Words considered by Štambuk dated, archaic, obsolete... as well as spelling of those words, are very much in everyday use, others however only by educated people (cultural élite). The sole goal of Štambuk (a Yugoslav nationalist, a hardcore Vukovian - however he call himself) is to promote "Serbo-Croatian" language, and deny existence of Croatian language, which is ridicules because of Croatian millennial literature and culture of written word, whilst Serbian language (solely created by The Great Wolf) started to exist in 19th century, as well as Macedonian and Slovenian. So if there is only one language it is certainly not Serbo-Croatian, nor Slovenian, nor Croato-Slovenian, but only Croatian. Just like there is no American, Australian, Canadian English... but only English language. Slavuj (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked for ad hominems. Learn how to participate in a civilized discourse or get lost. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 10:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * @Slavuj. It's you who acts nationalistic. This kind of speech doesn't impress anyone here any more. We had to read many pages of abuse in the past. All words are welcome, if they meet CFI and follow our standards. If you hate using "Serbo-Croatian", Wiktionary is not for you. Deal with our rules or leave. We work with words, not politics and we don't have resources to work with hatemongers. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I really don't understand Your eagerness to preserve "Serbo-Croatian", no one forces Norwegian, Danish and Swedish in one language in some "N-D-F language", nor any one forces Czech and Slovak into Czechoslovakian language, nor any one forces Russian and Ukrainian into one language, aad all of them have the same degree of mutual intelligibility, as Serbian and Croatian does, all of this is stupid. Only "holy" Serbo-Croatian needs to exist, this is pointless. I do understand Štambuk and his eagerness (Yugoslav and Vukovian), however I can't put my finger on Your eagenessness. I am not going to make any contributions more on this god-forsaken misery of quasi-dictionary. I was trying to repair tainted integrity of historic Croatian language, but as All, in vain. Slavuj (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Slavuj. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Slavuj~enwiktionary that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 07:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)