User talk:SnowyCinema/2016-17

Recent entries
You have been adding entries in languages you don't speak at all and for which you can't verify the correctness, and have not even tried to use correct formatting. Please stop doing this. Such bad entries take a long time for editors who actually speak those languages to notice and fix up, and having a lot more questionable content around does not help anybody. (Wikipedias often make up vocabulary, by the way — they are not a reliable source for Wiktionary entries.) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand, however, why is it not the correct formatting if the templates and such are clearly useable? Of course, I was trying to format them correctly, but doing it in as simple of a way as possible since I don't know much about the words. I was doing L2, L3, head, and then definition with numbering, so what was the formatting error in this? Philmonte101 (talk) 17:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, you must understand that all I'm trying to do is help out. I'm interested in many languages, though I can't speak them. I have had a sense that wikis were about sharing what you know, even if it's very little, and others can add to it what they know. So that's another thing confusing me as to why I shouldn't add these types of entries...? Philmonte101 (talk) 17:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * For example, see https://pt.wiktionary.org/wiki/Danimarka#Albanês . It was added by a user who doesn't seem to have much knowledge of the Albanian language, and was just adding translations to the word in that Wiktionary. I mean, think of the likelihood that a Portuguese speaker would understand Albanian, out of all things? Obviously, there probably are Portuguese/Albanian speakers, but not many at all. My point is, had someone not added that via simple translation knowledge without being a Albanian speaker, that entry may never have been added to the Portuguese Wiktionary, thus decreasing its quantity by a lot. Philmonte101 (talk) 17:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I know that you're just trying to help out, and have good intentions. The issue is that in our efforts to be a serious dictionary, we need to ensure that our content is of good quality. You can't tell if it is or isn't, because you don't know anything about the words that you're adding. That can introduce errors that take a long time to deal with. One way you can help fix this is to add to the stub entries you have created (replace "code" with the appropriate language code). This helps to ensure that eventually, someone will check the entry and fix it if it needs to be fixed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Danish IPA
You make mistakes in your IPA transcriptions for Danish entries, because you copy+paste the oversimplified phonetic transcriptions from Den Danske Ordbog. Please use the phonetic transcription system as described in Danish phonology as to be consistent with other Danish entries containing phonetic transcriptions. Thank you. --87.63.114.210 18:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

NativeCat
Oh, I didn't realise it was you. You sure use a lot of names. Welcome back. Equinox ◑ 16:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah thanks. This site is pretty fun, so it's easy to get back into it! Philmonte101 (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, welcome back buddy! — Ungoliant (falai) 15:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Oxygen Saturation
Is it necessary to put an edit summary saying "page has been created" every single time I delete a blue link off of a requested entries page? If you think so, I'll do it, but to me that seems tedious. If you'd taken the time and checked, is now a page with an entry for English, so it's supposed to be deleted from the request page (as per the instructions at the top). --AtalinaDove (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * @User:AtalinaDove Excuse me, as I tried to search it before, and was mistaken to see no results somehow. It was a rather quick undo, I apologize. I'll try to overlook things more carefully next time. Philmonte101 (talk) 20:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * All's good :) --AtalinaDove (talk) 20:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Although, just for advice, it may be helpful to add a small edit summary after a removal. For instance "rv blue link" or something. Just to make it easier for a user not to make that mistake again (though it doesn't happen often). So it is whatever you prefer, there's no rule about it. Philmonte101 (talk) 20:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds reasonable. Also, sorry for sounding harsh earlier, wasn't intended (I forget sometimes that you can't indicate your tone of voice when typing very well). --AtalinaDove (talk) 20:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

statis lock
Did you mean (as in Transformers)? SemperBlotto (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops, yes. How did I misread that all this time? Philmonte101 (talk) 06:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It caught my attention not only because of Transformers, where I found it, but also because it's apparently used in other contexts.

"'She may be in stasis lock.' 'We're standing by,'"

"I will put both ships in stasis lock for two minutes to show I can hold you." 

Idk, do you think this is SoP? I'm not really familiar with the meaning of this term, so I don't know. It seems to be a boating-related term. Philmonte101 (talk) 06:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems to be a science fiction (rather than nautical) term.SemperBlotto (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Due to a bug that has been reported and will hopefully soon be corrected, makes faulty entries for genitive singular indefinite forms. I have caught most of them, but please be more careful in general when editing Wiktionary.__Gamren (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * In other words, don't create an entry, even a form-of entry, unless you either know yourself that it is are correct, or have looked it up outside of Wiktionary. --WikiTiki89 19:13, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * @ User:Gamren Please link me to the discussion. I thought that genitive singular indefinites were always extended with an -s, unless the noun already had an s in which case it would have an -'. Philmonte101 (talk) 22:28, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I am afraid I do not know to which discussion you are referring. Your understanding of genitives is correct, except that words ending in x or z also get an apostrophe. Here are a few examples, all of which are recent:, , , see my contribs for more.__Gamren (talk) 06:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I think what he's trying to say is that it was the auto-generated text of the entry that was wrong, and not the title of the entry. It said "definite" when it should have said "indefinite". --WikiTiki89 15:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * That is precisely what I was "trying" to say.__Gamren (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Transformers stuff
Hi. Stuff that isn't related to Wiktionary isn't really welcome here: you shouldn't use your user pages (and our Web hosting, often funded by volunteers) for irrelevant material. I don't want to jump in and delete it outright but could you consider moving it elsewhere? I know you know how, because you used to have that Mona wiki of your own. Equinox ◑ 00:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Equinox I knew this already. I was hoping that no one would notice and become offended by it, because right now I do not have much money and it's hard for me to fund for a website of my own at this moment. I was planning on making one, and was going to speedy the WT pages when I did. Perhaps I can keep them there for at least another few days until I get the means to get another website hosted? Thanks. Philmonte101 (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Can't you just set up a free e-mail account and store them as messages in there? Equinox ◑ 00:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * User:Equinox There's a user in the speedrun community with whom I'm currently sharing this stuff. I just found it convenient to put it here on my namespace because this site has wiki formatting and the site I'm planning to make will have a wiki as well as a forum. Do you really want it off that badly? I mean if you really do, I'll take it off now, since it'd just get deleted probably by an admin (such as/or yourself) due to failure to cooperate with sysops. I'll move it to email or docs, but only if it's so serious that I can't keep it here for just a couple more days. Philmonte101 (talk) 00:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * A few days or weeks certainly won't hurt. I could actually offer you Web space myself, but it would hard to allow wiki-style editing rather than just FTP uploading of files. Equinox ◑ 01:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * That is an extremely nice offer, User:Equinox, thanks, but I'd rather do it the regular way. I'm about to sell something for a lot of money, so I will probably have enough money to get the site very soon! So furthermore, the pages will also be deleted soon. Regards, Philmonte101 (talk) 03:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Try storing it in Google Docs and sharing the docs. Or Dropbox or any other similar service. Or just host your own web server without a domain name. --WikiTiki89 15:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Interwiki
FYI, as for, we have bots that do this and do not require patrolling. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There was a Malagasy entry for one entry in English that I remember that hadn't been added by a bot for 5 years. Can't remember which one this was though. Philmonte101 (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, Malagasy Wiktionary is a swamp anyway. And bot edits do not require patrolling and work in large volumes; check e.g. Special:Contributions/RobokoBot, and that's only one of several Interwiki bots. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please don't touch other user's posts
. It then looks like they wrote something which they did not really write. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

A couple of terms
FYI, I sent a couple of terms to RFV: politiscience, birdfucker, semipissed, and semiangry. I can't find three attesting quotations, but maybe you will have better luck. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The same case is semidorky. Beware that you have to actually check the quotations to see whether there is a hyphen, when using Google Books. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV templates must not be removed until three citations have actually been added. Equinox ◑ 16:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

restrat
This is just a typo, not a legit misspelling. Also, we do not even create inflections (-ing, -ed, etc.) for misspellings: use instead. Equinox ◑ 23:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Why mustn't we contain typo entries? How can we really tell the difference between a typo and a non-typo. Usually it's obvious to us, but how do we know it's this way every single time it was written? Plus they meet WT:ATTEST in the way that they have more than 3 archived sources. Why can't we make those entries? Philmonte101 (talk) 23:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * They're useless. Many people write dgo for dog, but that would be ridiculous clutter in a dictionary. If you showed someone restrat, they would always say, "yes, my mistake, I typed it wrong". It's not like someone who genuinely thinks that minuscule is spelled miniscule. Equinox ◑ 23:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Translation request
I happened to see your translation request on CodeCat's page. It seems she didn't actually translate that phrase for you. Here it goes:
 * "Hi. I am an 18-year-old bisexual girl looking for a sweet, older girl to talk to. I do not speak Dutch, but I'd like to learn the language. I am from the United States."
 * Hoi. Ik ben een biseksueel meisje van 18 jaar. Ik zoek een lief ouder meisje waarmee ik kan praten. Ik spreek geen Nederlands, maar ik zou deze taal graag willen leren. Ik kom uit de Verenigde Staten.

Now I'll ask you to translate something to Sintelsk for me in return:
 * "In the winter the dry leaves are flying around in the air."
 * "It'll stop snowing soon, then the weather will become better again."
 * "Put some coals into the oven, so that the milk starts boiling soon."

Thank you in advance. Kolmiel (talk) 00:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @ User:Kolmiel Thank you for translating for me. In return, yes, I will happily do this for you. I never get Sintelsk requests, so really it is me who should thank you. If you'd like to see an index, see User:Philmonte101/Sintelsk/Index.
 * "Pa vinteren, dé koropeta fuola flygé omkri in lufen."
 * "It vil stopa snéene snat, nést vajren vil beháa beder ien."
 * "Plas nola kula inti ounen, sodat mélken vil starta a boala snat."
 * Thanks so much for taking notice to this rare constructed language. Philmonte101 (talk) 10:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. Closest to Scandinavian I'd say, but also some English and some other (probably an unknown substrate language ;)). Incase you're wondering, those three sentences were the first of some 40 that were used by linguists to classify the German dialects. And PS: Your ping didn't work. I think you need to do it like this or this . Cheers. Kolmiel (talk) 13:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The reason the ping didn't work is because you need to add a link to the user page in a new paragraph and signed with  in the same edit. The  template is optional and just a convenience. See mw:Manual:Echo for more info. --WikiTiki89 14:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry to say this, but Wiktionary is really not the right place for you to document your conlang. We're not in the business of hosting webpages. There are lots of other non-WMF wikis that are dedicated to just that. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 15:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been told before about this lang that it would be okay to put stuff about it on my user page, since it is language-related. Philmonte101 (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I would it's OK to post a little bit of information on it just for some background, but not entire dictionaries and grammar guides. If you want to do that, try to create a Wikia, they're free if you get approved for one (I'm not sure what their criteria are). --WikiTiki89 15:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

RFV/RFD rules
The rules for WT:RFV and WT:RFD are listed at the top of those pages. It says discussions should last for a month before being closed, and then there should be an additional week before they are archived. You're moving too fast. Rome wasn't built in a day; people are working on their own stuff too, and can't deal with your requests immediately. Give us more time in future! Equinox ◑ 18:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Something else: the keep/delete votes are an RFD thing, because editors make the decision of whether to delete or not. Votes aren't placed at RFV, because RFV is purely about trying to find three suitable citations. If we can, we keep; if we can't, we delete. Equinox ◑ 01:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah I apologize. I did not know about the keep/delete policy in RFV. I will discontinue acting like it's a vote. Philmonte101 (talk) 01:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

pigsit
"A dog, especially a pig"? What kind of biology lessons did you have? Is this attestable? Equinox ◑ 01:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Added to my list of funniest quotes. Philmonte101 (talk) 01:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm lmfao at that typo so hard. Philmonte101 (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * From Google Books, it seems to be used for guinea pigs, which are definitely not pigs. Equinox ◑ 01:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And thanks for the time and effort you put into checking my entries. Philmonte101 (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Regarding "it was a horrid typo": I bet you had copied and pasted from somewhere. We need a name for the pasting-typo. A "pasto"? When someone fixes it, you get antipasto. Equinox ◑ 01:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * How does the Wiktionary namespace page for protologisms work? I could add those there lol. Philmonte101 (talk) 01:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * True enough, there is the horrid rubbish dump known as WT:LOP. Don't forget your gas-mask. Equinox ◑ 01:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Note
Posting boldfaced RFV failed into a RFV discussion when you actually cannot delete the entry is not really helpful. The boldfaced RFV failed indicates that a closure has been made; deleting the entry is part of that closure. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not realize this. So wait, does that mean I should speedy the page, and then once it's deleted, then say RFV failed? Philmonte101 (talk) 09:19, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Add "RFV failed" to the RFV. Don't put anything on the page itself; just wait and whoever archives the discussion will delete the page. Equinox ◑ 09:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That's not the usual practice, AFAIK. The usual practice is that whoever closes the discussion as RFV failed also deletes the page, and moves any citations to Citations: namespace. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * So what you're saying is that terms can be RFV failed by non-admins, but it's just not recommended? Philmonte101 (talk) 09:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * A non-admin cannot delete a term, and therefore should not RFV fail it. That's why I am only marking a discussion as RFV failed if someone else has already deleted the term. I have no compunction about closing discussions as RFV passed since it does not require an admin action. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * But a non-admin can delete a section and therefore can meaningfully RFV fail it. What you did in Talk:jujubo is perfectly fine and helful. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Note 2
On another note, it's rather pointless to post a block of text to a spammer. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * So, is it a bot? It appeared that the user saw Wiktionary as a place to post his word invention. I wanted to make it clear to him that that's not what this site is for. If it's a bot, yeah we should just block it on sight. Also, I know it's nearly pointless to send him a welcoming message, but what's the bad part? At least I'm trying to be nice and make people feel welcomed. You never know, it could've actually been a person, and they could actually come back out and make helpful edits later, or at least try to, as unlikely as it is. Philmonte101 (talk) 09:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You mean like this? Dear burglar, in this country, burglary is frowned upon. We appreciate cultural differences and we welcome the enrichment of our culture by your culture, but burglary is something that really is considered to be a poor form. Similarly, the present culture is not entirely enthusiastic about canibalism, so we would appreciate if you kindly stopped. Like that? --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Dan Polansky, okay okay I get the point. I just thought that the user may have mistaken Wiktionary as a place to invent words and publish them. I'm sure there are plenty of other places for that online, but this isn't one of them. All I wanted to do was make it clear that Wiktionary is not a place to invent. That's all. It's done and over with now. Let's move on. Philmonte101 (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome - Fáilte
Go raibh maith agat! Ériugena (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Romanian translation request
Hi ! Just wanted to let you know that I've seen your request and I'm on it. Unfortunately, night has fallen here (Sweden) and it's getting late so I'll get back to you tomorrow evening. All the best, --Robbie SWE (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

kategoriaviittaus
You have made an entry request for this term on July 11th. Where have you seen it? --Hekaheka (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * It's on your user page (and apparently nowhere else indexed by Google)! Equinox ◑ 22:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Adjective + noun declensions
In light of your question regarding the declensions of nouns modified by adjectives, I made this: How do you feel about this?___Gamren (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @User:Gamren Thank you for making this. In regards to my personal opinion on the matter, I feel it is necessary to have complete links to, for instance, "kunstige intelligenser" in the template. But it's still great the way it is. Very informative to the readers. I like it! Keep up with the good and active work on helping with our Danish lexicon so much. Philmonte101 (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have started a discussion here, because I feel we need some more perspectives.__Gamren (talk) 17:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Lojban
Lojban is not a language like other languages. There are no nouns, verb or adjectives in the standard sense- there are gismu and brivla, which are like all of them wrapped into one, and are documented as such. For more information, feel free to look at the About Lojban page. I probably shouldn't bother you about pages you made a month ago though, so sorry about that :P -Xbony2 (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * There's no expiration date to bother someone about a page. I've bothered people about pages they created over 10 years before. --WikiTiki89 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Ten years? Gee. No offense, but that sounds more like a minor case of trolling :P -Xbony2 (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Aye, all of us have done it. Philmonte101 (talk) 01:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

WOTD and "on like Donkey Kong"
Thanks for your recent update. By the way, for future reference, you need to update both "Word of the day/Archive/2017/July" and "Word of the day/July 9". If you don't update the latter, the change doesn't actually appear on the Main Page. (I've already done so for you.) — SMUconlaw (talk) 07:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Again?
Again? --WikiTiki89 21:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Well at least I went through the name change process this time like people are asking me to do instead of making more accounts. PseudoSkull (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think this is a cooler name than "Philmonte101" anyway. PseudoSkull (talk) 21:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This is becoming excessive either way.__Gamren (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, too many usernames. --Derrib9 (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I just discovered that we have the same birthday. Equinox ◑ 02:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Equinox What's yours? PseudoSkull (talk) 21:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * 23 May in the 1980. Equinox ◑ 21:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Cool! Deja vu, I feel like we found this out about each other before, but I can't really remember. How did you find out my birthday? PseudoSkull (talk) 22:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Can't remember precisely, but you posted it somewhere. I was idly googling around looking for your gaming videos IIRC. Equinox ◑ 22:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

A practical argument against SOPs
See, and , under Derived terms. (Though fair's fair, quite a few of them would be permitted as entries if they were attested.) Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

absolut temperatur calque of absolute temperature?
This seems improbable. Do you have a source?__Gamren (talk) 09:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Why "improbable"? Seems pretty probable to me, seeing how most scientific/technical terms in other languages that are borrowed statistically are borrowed straight from English, if not Latin. PseudoSkull (talk) 14:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It might just as well be calqued from, say, French, German or Italian, or coined by Danes. English' status as a dominating scientific language is quite recent. Perhaps you could show me that absolute temperature was used before e.g. absolut temperatur, absolute Temperatur? If you find that, or any other source, please readd the etymology.__Gamren (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Surnames
Hi there. If you would like a list of surnames (as used in England and Wales) you might like to visit. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Eagle Scout reversion
I disagree with your reversion here. Yes, you can say "he has the job of bus conductor", "he holds the position of colonel", etc. That's not a separate sense. Equinox ◑ 02:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

nelfies
Please check that every word you create, even a plural, is actually attestable. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

funky module error
Please fix this. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * @User:Chuck Entz Thanks for checking with me. I would if User:CodeCat can change the template so that it allows someone to arbitrarily choose t-forms and e-forms? Because User:Gamren said he doesn't want to mess with it. PseudoSkull (talk) 13:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

meaning "scholar"?
What is your source for that?__Gamren (talk) 13:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * @User:Gamren Well the Danish sense 3 says this. I don't think I added that sense. But do you think this is incorrect? We could challenge that sense at RFV possibly. PseudoSkull (talk) 14:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * See this. User:Leolaursen added this entire entry with the word "scholar". PseudoSkull (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, why not.__Gamren (talk) 18:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I like your user page
I really like the thoughts you wrote on your user page! They really resonate with me. in a couple places, I laughed sympathetically.

I originally came here to simply say that. However, I saw some people mention you've had a lot of usernames, so I want to suggest placing a list of them somewhere on your user page and perhaps at the very top of your user talk page. I've seen people do that on en.WP, and it seems to help some people keep track of who a person is, or at least mollify the critics a bit. Personally, I'm fine either way.

Anyway, thanks for being interesting! —Geekdiva (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @User:Geekdiva Thanks so much for seeing my recent rant on my user page. I'll probably bring that back to normal sooner or later. I just got extremely mad at myself for continuing my addictive cycle here, so I put that there to remind myself to stay the hell away from editing here constantly for a while. On my old user page, I indeed had a list of usernames I've had here. If you look in the page's history, you'll see. Also, I'm staying with this username now.
 * Not to offend any users here, but this activity is really pissing me off lately. EVEN tool-assisted speedrunning is more self-constructive than editing this site. This wiki in particular is a void which has been slowly eating away my brain, keeping me away from all civilization whatsoever, and even from the few friends and family I have. It's fun indeed, but Wiktionary editing is extremely unhealthy IMO. I may decide to quit editing here, or even to ask an admin to indefinitely block me (don't do it yet please!). I'm thinking about it, and taking it into consideration. PseudoSkull (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Re: "shut up me"
Haha, I know the feeling well! Nescit vox missa reverti. Equinox ◑ 17:53, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * @ User:Equinox At the time I had 35 hours of no sleep, and that thing I said was pretty damn stupid. PseudoSkull (talk) 04:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * My record is about 45. Keep working on it! Equinox ◑ 04:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Lol, that's an awesome record! PseudoSkull (talk) 04:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

playstation
In September 2016, you entered a request for the word "playstation", meaning a station for playing, not the console. The term you were looking for is not one word, but two: "play station", see this or this. Unfortunately, that is not a valid dictionary term, as it is sum of parts. Kiwima (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

New entries
It's nice to see you back in action. Your suggested translation of aktionere is accurate.__Gamren (talk) 22:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which, I read that you were interested in adding large quantities of derived terms. Are you aware that KorpusDK lets you search with regexes? 56 million words may not be a whole lot, but if one wishes to start with the most common words, that may be an advantage.__Gamren (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)