User talk:Svartava/Middle Indo-Aryan extensions

Tenability
Yes, it doesn’t seem like there will be entries for these extensions since they either have too little meaning or no meaning. It has often been said that ‘the Appendix is where ideas go to die’, so having links to such an appendix would be crucial. By
 * link to it like this: Middle Indo-Aryan -EXT-

are you referring to hard redirects? Kutchkutch (talk) 02:50, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * @Kutchkutch: No; linking it like Appendix:Middle Indo-Aryan extensions . I've added links. We'll move this to Appendix:Middle Indo-Aryan extensions . This would actually make it clear that  is valid, as I'm intending to document their OIA origins, with attestations as you can see. आकडा < *अङ्कडक/*अङ्कलक, although -ड- looks like purely MIA ext Svārtava2 • 05:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * According to 184, Sanskrit -ट became Prakrit -𑀟-. This may why the ट in झपाटणे is from -𑀝𑁆𑀝- in R:CDIAL instead of -𑀝- by analogy with -𑀓𑁆𑀓- to क and -𑀮𑁆𑀮- to ल in languages with ळ. Kutchkutch (talk) 04:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)