User talk:Vuzorg

Welcome Message
--Lo Ximiendo (talk) 13:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry
I'm sorry, the comment about your level of English was unkind and based on nothing. I don't want to chase you away from Wiktionary, because we clearly need people who know Zazaki and who can write more Zazaki entries. — Eru·tuon 19:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2017–April 2022
Zazaki. They seem to think every word is a noun, add random invalid parameters to templates, and have also added odd "Zazaki language" definitions to some entries. —CodeCat 13:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Because they are noun. Vuzorg (talk) 13:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Not if your definitions are correct. For instance, you defined as "high", which is an adjective, and you put it in Category:zza:Grammar without any explanation as to what it has to do with grammar.  do you think this might be a Marmase sock? Chuck Entz (talk) 18:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like Vuzorg does not know English as well as they think they do (en-3 in their Babel box; I would speculate en-1 would be more accurate), and they do not quite understand the proper entry format. — Eru·tuon 19:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I would go further and say they don't understand the concepts behind the formatting, either. For instance, they had derived from "Indo-European English here", which shows they don't know what an etymology is for, and elsewhere they had a definition line that said "Zazaki language" before the actual definition lines, and added Category:zza:Grammar to several entries that weren't about grammar.
 * Their account was created a week after Marmase was globally locked in 2015, and they've avoided notice because, until today, no one has looked at or edited their work except for bots (and in one, User:Embryomystic editing like a bot). Unless Vahag can confirm the accuracy of their edits, I'm inclined to delete and remove it all as "No usable content given". Chuck Entz (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned up after the user based on my Zazaki sources. His definitions are usually correct, but the formatting is terrible. I don't know if this is Marmase's sock., please look at the changes we made to your contributions and learn our formatting guidelines. --Vahag (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hey what's problem there? I'm not sock puppet of Marmase. I only don't know formatting guidelines very well. I won't contribute anymore. And Eru·tuon, you, be careful when you speak about a subject, don't attack me, even you don't know me, you can't judge me and my English. Do I know you? No, so I don't talk about you. Vuzorg (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You're right, and I apologize for my comment about your English. — Eru·tuon 19:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

These all seem to have been cleaned up now, mainly by (thanks!). This, that and the other (talk) 10:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)